Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

13.0K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
13.0K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.7K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.7K
Measures of Central Tendency02:16

Measures of Central Tendency

19.1K
The "center" of a data set is also a way of describing location. The two most widely used measures of the "center" of the data are the mean (average) and the median. The words "mean" and "average" are often used interchangeably. The substitution of one word for the other is common practice. The technical term is "arithmetic mean" and "average" is technically a center location. However, in practice among non-statisticians,...
19.1K
Central Tendency: Analysis01:10

Central Tendency: Analysis

353
Measures of central tendency are tools used in biostatistics to identify the average or center of a dataset. They offer a single representative value for understanding and summarizing data distribution.
The mean is one such measure, calculated by totaling all values in a dataset and dividing by the number of values. For instance, the mean blood pressure reading (120, 130, 140, 150) would be 135. However, the mean can be affected by extreme values or outliers.
The median, another measure,...
353
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

172
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
172
Trimmed Mean01:10

Trimmed Mean

3.2K
While measuring the mean of a data set, care needs to be taken when associating the mean to its central tendency. The same goes for the arithmetic mean, the geometric mean, or the harmonic mean. This is because the presence of a single outlier data value can significantly affect the mean. That is, the mean is sensitive to fluctuations in the data set.
Although certain measures of central tendency are not sensitive to outliers, there are alternative versions of the mean that get around the...
3.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predation risk shapes among- and within-individual variation in behavior in poison frog tadpoles.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2026
Same author

Global meta-analysis reveals urban-associated behavioural differences among wild populations.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
Same author

Urbanization-related vocal variation in passerines: a comparative study.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

A new approach to quantify isotopic (co)variation across levels of biological organization using double-hierarchical generalized linear models.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
Same author

Trade-offs in avian parental care: a review of theory and meta-analysis of brood size manipulations.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2026
Same author

Environmental Variability Shapes Life-History Trade-Offs Within and Between Populations of a Long-Lived Seabird.

Ecology letters·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
08:51

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.8K

Collision between biological process and statistical analysis revealed by mean centring.

David F Westneat1, Yimen G Araya-Ajoy2, Hassen Allegue3

  • 1Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

The Journal of Animal Ecology
|September 30, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Statistical models in ecology can be problematic when covariate effects vary across levels. Mismatches between biological processes and statistical analysis, particularly with mean centring, lead to biased parameter estimates, especially for among-subject variance.

Keywords:
bivariate modelsenvironmental effectshierarchical causationlinear mixed-effects modelsmodel designparameter misestimationphenotypic plasticity

More Related Videos

Analysis of Multidimensional Microscopy Data Using Cell-ACDC
06:17

Analysis of Multidimensional Microscopy Data Using Cell-ACDC

Published on: November 7, 2025

298
Systems Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory and Hemodynamic Response to Traumatic Brain Injury
07:21

Systems Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory and Hemodynamic Response to Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: May 27, 2022

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
08:51

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.8K
Analysis of Multidimensional Microscopy Data Using Cell-ACDC
06:17

Analysis of Multidimensional Microscopy Data Using Cell-ACDC

Published on: November 7, 2025

298
Systems Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory and Hemodynamic Response to Traumatic Brain Injury
07:21

Systems Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory and Hemodynamic Response to Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: May 27, 2022

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Statistics
  • Biometry

Background:

  • Animal ecologists frequently analyze hierarchically structured data using linear mixed-effects models.
  • Challenges arise when covariate effect sizes differ across multiple levels, such as within versus among subjects.
  • Mean centring covariates within subjects is a common approach but has limitations regarding biological realism.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the consequences of mismatches between biological data-generating processes and statistical analysis methods in ecology.
  • To evaluate the robustness of different statistical analysis equations in estimating key ecological parameters under various data-generating scenarios.
  • To identify circumstances leading to bias in parameter estimation, particularly the among-subject variance.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated data from three distinct response-generating processes with varying covariate-response correlations.
  • Analyzed simulated data using three different statistical analysis equations, including those with mean centring.
  • Assessed the accuracy and bias of parameter estimates, focusing on among-subject variance.

Main Results:

  • Mismatches between biological generating processes and statistical analysis equations created significant challenges in estimating key parameters.
  • The among-subject variance in response was the most frequently misestimated parameter across different analytical approaches.
  • Bias in parameter estimates occurred even when analytical and generating equations matched mathematically, especially with limited covariate sampling ranges.

Conclusions:

  • No single statistical analysis equation demonstrated robustness in estimating all parameters across all simulated biological processes.
  • The choice of statistical model and data collection strategy significantly impacts the reliability of ecological inferences.
  • Researchers must carefully consider the underlying biological processes when selecting statistical models to avoid biased results and ensure valid conclusions.