Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

482
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
482
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

146
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
146

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying individual cost-balancing strategies when self-organizing task switching.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Sequential Effects on Reaction Time Distributions: Commonalities and Differences Across Paradigms.

Journal of cognition·2024
Same author

Estimating the proportions and latencies of reaction time outliers: A pooling method and case study of lexical decision tasks.

Behavior research methods·2024
Same author

Outlier exclusion procedures for reaction time analysis: The cures are generally worse than the disease.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2023
Same author

Evidence of resource sharing in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2022
Same author

Alternative sequential methods in statistical testing: A reply to Lakens (2021) and Erdfelder and Schnuerch (2021).

Psychological methods·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 7, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K

Effects of task probability on prioritized processing: Modulating the efficiency of parallel response selection.

Jeff Miller1, Jia Li Tang2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. miller@psy.otago.ac.nz.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|October 1, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cognitive resources can be shared between simultaneous tasks when efficient. This study shows that people allocate more processing capacity to tasks that are more likely to require a response, improving performance.

Keywords:
Bottleneck modelsCapacity modelsMultitaskingPrioritized processing paradigmTask probability

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K
The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

46.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 7, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K
The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

46.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Understanding cognitive resource allocation is crucial for explaining human performance in multitasking environments.
  • Limited cognitive resources necessitate strategic division between concurrent tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how limited cognitive resources are shared between simultaneously performed tasks.
  • To determine the conditions under which resource sharing is efficient and occurs.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a prioritized processing paradigm with primary and background tasks.
  • Manipulated the relative probability of responding to either the primary or background task across trial blocks.
  • Measured response times and analyzed compatibility and stimulus-onset asynchrony effects.

Main Results:

  • Background task response times were significantly faster when they were more probable.
  • Evidence of increased capacity allocation to the background task when its response probability was higher.
  • Compatibility and stimulus-onset asynchrony effects indicated dynamic resource division.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive resources can be dynamically shared between parallel tasks based on efficiency and response probability.
  • Task prioritization and resource allocation are flexible, adapting to task demands.
  • Supports a model of parallel processing with divisible attentional resources.