Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

98.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
98.7K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.1K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.1K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

6.6K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
6.6K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

296
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
296
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

7.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
7.4K
Sampling Distribution01:12

Sampling Distribution

16.3K
Given simple random samples of size n from a given population with a measured characteristic such as mean, proportion, or standard deviation for each sample, the probability distribution of all the measured characteristics is called a sampling distribution. How much the statistic varies from one sample to another is known as the sampling variability of a statistic. You typically measure the sampling variability of a statistic by its standard error. The standard error of the mean is an example...
16.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Role of Intention, Behavioral Regulation, and Physical Activity Behavior in the Prediction of Physical Activity Identity across Time.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

The case for the curve: Parametric regression with second- and third-order polynomial functions of predictors should be routine.

Psychological methods·2023
Same author

Generalized measurement error: Intrinsic and incidental measurement error.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Theoretical considerations when simulating data from the g-and-h family of distributions.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2022
Same author

The Importance of Thinking Multivariately When Setting Subscale Cutoff Scores.

Educational and psychological measurement·2022
Same author

How to think clearly about the central limit theorem.

Psychological methods·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.2K

Measurement protocols, random-variable-valued measurements, and response process error: Estimation and inference when

Edward Kroc1

  • 1Measurement, Evaluation, and Research Methodology Program, Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, and Special Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Plos One
|October 1, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Random-variable-valued measurements (RVVMs) offer a new framework to quantify response process error in non-deterministic data. This approach improves research inferences by accounting for uncertainty in measurements across various scientific fields.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.6K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.2K
Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.6K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • Measurement theory
  • Statistical modeling
  • Applied sciences

Background:

  • Traditional measurement methods assume deterministic outputs, failing to account for inherent variability.
  • Many scientific fields, such as psychology and conservation biology, encounter non-deterministic data due to response process error.
  • Ignoring this uncertainty can lead to compromised research quality and inaccurate conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel framework, random-variable-valued measurements (RVVMs), for handling non-deterministic sample data.
  • To provide a theoretical basis for explicitly quantifying response process error in measurement.
  • To demonstrate the applicability of RVVMs in diverse scientific research contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Developing a general theory for RVVMs.
  • Assigning probability measures to sample instantiations of measurement processes.
  • Explicitly modeling response process error at the sample-unit level.

Main Results:

  • RVVMs provide a robust method for analyzing data with inherent uncertainty.
  • The framework allows for the accurate quantification of measurement error.
  • Applications in psychology and conservation biology highlight the practical utility of RVVMs.

Conclusions:

  • RVVMs represent a significant advancement in measurement theory for non-deterministic data.
  • This framework enhances the reliability and validity of inferences in applied research.
  • Adoption of RVVMs is recommended for studies susceptible to response process error.