Peripheral stimulation affects subthreshold Triple Stimulation Technique
L Caranzano1, M A Stephan2, M Bedulli2
1Neurology Service, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland; Faculté de Biologie et de Médecine, Doctoral School, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Background:
Compared to conventional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the triple stimulation technique (TST) strongly decrease the effects of desynchronization of descending discharges and accompanying phase cancellation that follow TMS and offers a more sensitive method to quantify motor evoked potentials (MEPs).
New Method:
Using the TST, we explored as to whether sub-threshold TMS evokes peripheral motor neuron discharges (MNs). We compared the number of MEPs elicited by TMS and by TST in fifteen healthy participants. We used the subthreshold intensity of 80 % resting motor threshold. To control the TST assessment of the corticospinal tract, we included a peripheral stimulation control condition, which consisted of peripheral stimulation alone, in a subgroup of five volunteers.
Results:
Compared to TMS, TST at sub-threshold intensities did not detect significantly more responses unequivocally attributable to the cortical stimulation. In contrast, the peripheral supra-maximal stimuli produced confounding effects in the TST condition that were, in part, indistinguishable from cortical responses.
Comparison With Existing Methods:
At subthreshold TMS intensities, the TST does not detect more discharges of spinal MNs than conventional TMS and, in addition, it is confounded by effects from peripheral stimulation.
Conclusion:
The TST can be useful in assessing the integrity of the MN pool and of the corticospinal tract. However, if used at near threshold intensity, the confounding effects of peripheral stimulation need to be considered; for instance, in paired-pulse stimulation paradigms assessing the cortical physiology.
