Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring Intrinsically Disordered Protein Dynamics Through NMR Relaxation Experiments
Published on: November 1, 2024
Systematic differences in the relaxation stretching of polar molecular liquids probed by dielectric vs magnetic
Thomas Körber1, Robert Stäglich1, Catalin Gainaru2
1Anorganische Chemie III and Nordbayerisches NMR Zentrum, Universität Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany.
Abstract:
Relaxation spectra of molecular glass formers devoid of secondary relaxation maxima, as measured by dielectric spectroscopy (DS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxometry, photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS), and Fabry-Perot interferometry, are quantitatively compared in terms of the Kohlrausch stretching parameter βK. For a reliable estimate of βK, the excess wing contribution has to be included in the spectral analysis. The relaxation stretching probed by PCS and NMR varies only weakly among the liquids (βK = 0.58 ± 0.06). It is similar to that found in DS, provided that the liquid is sufficiently nonpolar (relaxation strength Δε≲6). For larger strengths, larger βK DS (narrowed relaxation spectra) are found when compared to those reported from NMR and PCS. Frequency-temperature superposition (FTS) holds for PCS and NMR. This is demonstrated by data scaling and, for the few glass formers for which results are available, by the equivalence of the susceptibilities χPCS ″ωτ∝χNMR ″τ∝χNMR ″ω, i.e., measuring at a constant frequency is equivalent to measuring at a constant temperature or constant correlation time. In this context, a plot of the spin-lattice relaxation rate R1(T) as a function of the spin-spin relaxation rate R2(T) is suggested to reveal the stretching parameter without the need to perform frequency-dependent investigations. Dielectrically, we identify a trend of increasing deviations from FTS with increasing Δε. Depending on the technique and glass former, the relative relaxation strength of the excess wing varies, whereas its exponent appears to be method independent for a given substance. For polar liquids, we discuss possible reasons for the discrepancy between the results from PCS and NMR as compared to those from DS.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR of Conformationally Flexible Molecules: Variable-Temperature NMR
¹H NMR of Conformationally Flexible Molecules: Temporal Resolution
2D NMR: Overview of Homonuclear Correlation Techniques
COSY90 is the standard two-dimensional (2D) COSY experiment that...
¹³C NMR: Distortionless Enhancement by Polarization Transfer (DEPT)
IR Spectroscopy: Hooke's Law Approximation of Molecular Vibration
According to Hooke's law, the vibrational frequency is directly proportional to...
Atomic Nuclei: Types of Nuclear Relaxation
In spin–lattice or longitudinal relaxation, the excited spins exchange energy with the surrounding lattice as they return to the lower energy level. Among several mechanisms that contribute to spin–lattice relaxation, magnetic dipolar interactions are significant. Here, the excited nucleus transfers...

![Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F59399.jpg&w=3840&q=50)