Monitoring risk assessment on an acute psychiatric ward: Effects on aggression, seclusion and nurse behaviour
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
Esther J R Florisse1, Philippe A E G Delespaul1,2
1Mondriaan Mental Health Care, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Evidence of risk assessment procedures is scarce and inconclusive. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of risk assessment on aggression and the use of coercive interventions in an acute psychiatric admission setting. In addition, we evaluated nurse behaviour before and after the use of risk assessment. To take the fluctuations with regard to aggression and coercive interventions into account, we allowed 26 weeks for baseline measurements, followed by a 26 weeks steady-state period after the implementation of the risk assessment instrument. Contrary to expectations, no positive effects of risk assessment were found on aggression or on coercive interventions. Time spent in seclusion increased significantly with more than 10 hours on average after implementation. Furthermore, there were only negative effects on nurse behaviour and experiences. Among other things, they felt more stressed, spent more time on administration tasks and spent less time with patients after the implementation. In conclusion, there is insufficient evidence to use structured short-term risk assessment to reduce aggression or coercive interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Dysrhythmias VII: Nursing Management of Dysrhythmias
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
Naturalistic Observations

