Unraveling the multilayer mechanical response of aorta using layer-specific residual stresses and experimental...

To test the capability of the multilayer model, we used previously published layer-specific experimental data relating to the axial pre-stretch, the opening angle, the fiber distribution obtained by polarized light microscopy measurements, and the uniaxial and biaxial response of the porcine descending and abdominal aorta. We fitted the mechanical behavior of each arterial layer using Gasser, Holzapfel and Ogden strain energy function using the dispersion parameter κ as phenomenological parameter obtained during the fitting procedure or computed from the experimental fiber distribution. A multilayer finite element model of the whole aorta with the dimensions of the circumferential and longitudinal strips were then built using layer-specific material parameters previously fitted. This model was used to capture the whole aorta response under uniaxial and biaxial stress states and to reproduce the response of the whole aorta to internal pressure. Our results show that a model based on a multilayer structure without residual stresses is unable to render the uniaxial and biaxial mechanical response of the aorta (R²=0.6954 and R²=0.8582 for descending thoracic aorta (DTA) and infrarenal abdominal aorta (IAA), respectively). Only an appropriate multilayer model that includes layer-specific residual stresses can reproduce the response of the whole aorta (R²=0.9787 and R²=0.9636 for DTA and IAA respectively). In addition, a multilayer model without residual stresses produces the same stress distribution as a monolayer model without residual stresses where the maximal value of circumferential and longitudinal stresses appears at the inner radius of the intima. Finally, if layer-specific residual stresses are not available, there is less error the stress distribution using a monolayer model with residual stresses that a multilayer model without residual stresses.