Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

11:28
A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
12.8K
Assessment of Thorax Finite Element Model Response for Behind Armor Blunt Trauma Impact Loading Using an
D S Cronin1, M C Bustamante1, J Barker1
1Department of MME, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2 L 3G1, Canada.
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
|October 3, 2020
Summary
Computational models can predict behind-armor blunt trauma (BABT) injuries from ballistic impacts. This study developed a validated thorax model to assess BABT injury risk, improving body armor design.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Computational modeling
- Injury prevention
Background:
- Nonperforating ballistic impacts on thoracic armor cause behind-armor blunt trauma (BABT).
- Back face deformation (BFD) is measured to assess injury potential, but its link to actual injury remains uncertain.
- Computational human body models (HBMs) offer potential for improved BABT injury risk understanding for armor design.
Purpose of the Study:
- Develop and validate a computational methodology for applying BABT loading to a human body model (HBM).
- Assess the HBM's ability to predict BABT injury metrics like rib fractures and pulmonary contusion.
- Evaluate the correlation between BFD and predicted injury severity.
Main Methods:
- A computational thorax model was enhanced with a refined finite element mesh and high-deformation rate properties.
- BABT impact boundary conditions were recreated from an epidemiological survivor database using experimental deformation data.
- A novel prescribed displacement methodology was used to apply BABT loading to the HBM.
Main Results:
- The computational thorax model demonstrated numerical stability under BABT impact.
- Predicted rib fractures and pulmonary contusion increased with BFD, back face velocity, and input energy.
- Model predictions showed good agreement with medical records for rib fractures and injury ranks in 10 cases.
Conclusions:
- The integrated HBM and BABT loading method shows promise as a tool for evaluating body armor and assessing injury risk.
- This methodology can inform future body armor design by providing a better understanding of behind-armor blunt trauma.
- Further refinement may address positional sensitivity and data limitations for improved prediction accuracy.
Keywords:
behind armor blunt traumabody armorhard tissue fractureimpact loadinginjury risklung contusionthorax finite element model
