Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

09:03
Assessment of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from Paddy Field by Means of Static Closed Chambers Maintaining Plants Within Headspace
Published on: September 6, 2018
12.8K
Does overwintering change the inoculum effect on methane emissions from stored liquid manure?
Etienne L Le Riche1,2, Andrew C VanderZaag1, Jeffrey D Wood3
1Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada.
Journal of Environmental Quality
|October 5, 2020
Summary
Removing manure inoculum in the fall reduced methane (CH4) emissions from storage tanks by 34%. However, fall removal was less effective than spring removal, suggesting timing impacts this greenhouse gas mitigation strategy.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Science
- Environmental Science
- Microbiology
Background:
- Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly methane (CH4), from dairy manure storage are significant.
- Methane production in manure relies on specific microbial communities (inoculum).
- Previous studies show spring manure removal effectively reduces CH4 emissions by eliminating inoculum.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if fall removal of liquid dairy manure and its inoculum reduces CH4 emissions.
- To compare the effectiveness of fall versus spring inoculum removal for CH4 mitigation.
- To quantify emissions of CH4, N2O, NH3, and CO2 from manure storage under different inoculum conditions.
Main Methods:
- Six 11.88-m3 manure storage tanks were used, with three as inoculated controls (20% inoculum) and three as uninoculated treatments (0% inoculum).
- Inoculum was completely removed from treatment tanks in the fall/winter.
- Emissions of CH4, N2O, NH3, and CO2 were measured using flow-through chambers.
Main Results:
- Fall inoculum removal decreased total GHG emissions by 34% (CO2 equivalent) and the CH4 conversion factor by 29% compared to controls.
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) and ammonia (NH3) were minor contributors to the overall GHG budget (<2% CO2 equivalent).
- Fall removal was less effective in reducing CH4 emissions than spring removal reported in prior research.
Conclusions:
- Removing manure inoculum in the fall can reduce CH4 emissions from storage, but less effectively than spring removal.
- The timing of inoculum removal is a critical factor in the success of this CH4 mitigation strategy.
- Practical challenges exist for implementing complete, time-sensitive inoculum removal in large-scale farm manure storage systems.
Related Concept Videos
Microbes and Methanogenesis
Methanogenesis is a critical microbial process in anaerobic ecosystems responsible for the biological production of methane, a potent greenhouse gas and valuable biofuel. This metabolic pathway is primarily facilitated by methanogenic archaea, which thrive in anoxic environments such as wetlands, sediments, and animal gastrointestinal tracts. The absence of oxygen in these habitats prevents aerobic respiration, thereby favoring alternative biochemical pathways for organic matter degradation.In...
Microbes and Climate Change
Microorganisms are pivotal agents in Earth's biogeochemical cycles, significantly influencing climate dynamics through their metabolic activities. These microbes modulate the levels of key greenhouse gases by both contributing to and helping mitigate climate change.Microbial Contributions to Greenhouse Gas EmissionsRising global temperatures accelerate microbial metabolism, which, in turn, speeds up the decomposition of organic matter. This process releases carbon dioxide (CO₂) through...

