Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

06:23
The 4 Mountains Test: A Short Test of Spatial Memory with High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pre-dementia Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: October 13, 2016
33.5K
Brief visuospatial memory test-revised normative data and form equivalency for adults ages 80-89
Jessica Powell1,2, Lauren Blake1, Kathryn Wyman-Chick3,4
1Clinical Psychology, Midwestern University College of Health Sciences, Glendale, AZ, USA.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
|October 6, 2020
Summary
The Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) shows form equivalency in adults aged 80-84. However, older adults (85-89) found Form 4 more challenging than Form 1, suggesting form-specific data is needed.
Area of Science:
- Neuropsychology
- Gerontology
- Cognitive Assessment
Background:
- The Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) is a key tool for assessing visuospatial memory.
- Normative data is crucial for accurate interpretation of cognitive tests in aging populations.
- Understanding age-related differences in test performance is vital for clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish normative data for the BVMT-R in individuals aged 80-89.
- To evaluate the form equivalency of BVMT-R Forms 1 and 4 in this age group.
- To identify potential differences in performance between early and late 80s age groups.
Main Methods:
- A sample of 90 healthy adults aged 80-89 was recruited.
- BVMT-R Forms 1 and 4 were administered in a counterbalanced order, one week apart.
- Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to examine form equivalency and group differences.
Main Results:
- No significant gender, education, or MMSE differences were found between age groups.
- The 80-84 age group showed no significant differences between BVMT-R Forms 1 and 4.
- The 85-89 age group scored significantly higher on Form 1 compared to Form 4 for immediate recall and total recall.
Conclusions:
- BVMT-R Forms 1 and 4 are comparable for individuals in their early 80s.
- Individuals in their late 80s may experience greater difficulty with Form 4 compared to Form 1.
- Clinicians should consider using form-specific normative data for the BVMT-R in individuals aged 85-89.

