Texture Feature Comparison Between Step-and-Shoot and Continuous-Bed-Motion ¹⁸F-FDG PET

Our objective was to investigate the differences in texture features between step-and-shoot (SS) and continuous-bed-motion (CBM) imaging in phantom and clinical studies. Methods: A National Electrical Manufacturers Association body phantom was filled with ¹⁸F-FDG solution at a sphere-to-background ratio of 4:1. SS and CBM were performed using the same acquisition duration, and the data were reconstructed using 3-dimensional ordered-subset expectation maximization with time-of-flight algorithms. Texture features were extracted using the software LIFEx. A volume of interest was delineated on the 22-, 28-, and 37-mm spheres with a threshold of 42% of the maximum SUV. The voxel intensities were discretized using 2 resampling methods, namely a fixed bin size and a fixed bin number discretization. The discrete resampling values were set to 64 and 128. In total, 31 texture features were calculated with gray-level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM), gray-level run length matrix, neighborhood gray-level different matrix, and gray-level zone length matrix. The texture features of the SS and CBM images were compared for all settings using the paired t test and the coefficient of variation. In a clinical study, 27 lesions from 20 patients were examined using the same acquisition and image processing as were used during the phantom study. The percentage difference (%Diff) and correlation between the texture features from SS and CBM images were calculated to evaluate agreement between the 2 scanning techniques. Results: In the phantom study, the 11 features exhibited no significant difference between SS and CBM images, and the coefficient of variation was no more than 10%, depending on resampling conditions, whereas entropy and dissimilarity from GLCM fulfilled the criteria for all settings. In the clinical study, the entropy and dissimilarity from GLCM exhibited a low %Diff and excellent correlation in all resampling conditions. The %Diff of entropy was lower than that of dissimilarity. Conclusion: Differences between the texture features of SS and CBM images varied depending on the type of feature. Because entropy for GLCM exhibits minimal differences between SS and CBM images irrespective of resampling conditions, entropy may be the optimal feature to reduce the differences between the 2 scanning techniques.