Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

07:15
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020
7.2K
Deep learning algorithms out-perform veterinary pathologists in detecting the mitotically most active tumor region.
Marc Aubreville1, Christof A Bertram2, Christian Marzahl3
1Pattern Recognition Lab, Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. marc.aubreville@fau.de.
Scientific Reports
|October 6, 2020
Summary
Manual mitotic figure counting for tumor grading is subjective due to area selection variability. Deep learning models, particularly a two-stage object detector, show potential to improve accuracy and consistency in mitotic density assessment.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Pathology
- Computational Pathology
- Artificial Intelligence in Oncology
Background:
- Manual mitotic figure counting is crucial for tumor grading but suffers from inter-rater variability.
- Uneven mitotic figure distribution within tumor sections significantly impacts count accuracy based on selected areas.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of area selection on manual mitotic counts in canine cutaneous mast cell tumors.
- To compare the performance of deep learning models against veterinary pathologists in assessing mitotic density.
- To explore computer-based area selection for improving inter-rater agreement in mitotic counting.
Main Methods:
- Eight veterinary pathologists manually selected regions of interest for mitotic counting on 32 whole slide images.
- Three deep learning approaches were evaluated: direct patch prediction, segmentation mask derivation, and a two-stage object detection pipeline.
- Performance was assessed by comparing model predictions to ground truth mitotic counts and pathologist performance.
Main Results:
- Deep learning models, on average, outperformed human experts in mitotic count prediction.
- The two-stage object detection model achieved the highest correlation with ground truth mitotic counts (0.963-0.979).
- Significant variability in area selection was observed among pathologists, contributing to high variance in manual counts.
Conclusions:
- Computer-based area selection can support pathologists, potentially reducing inter-rater variability in manual mitotic counts.
- Deep learning offers a promising avenue for objective and accurate mitotic density assessment in tumor grading.
- Objective area selection via AI could enhance the reliability of mitotic counts in histopathological diagnostics.

