Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Standards of Care II

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

Standards of Care I

Standards of Care I

Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:

Legal Guidelines for Documentation

Legal Guidelines for Documentation

The legal guidelines for nursing documentation are essential for ensuring accurate, professional, and ethical recording of patient care. The guidelines are discussed here:

Torts III

Torts III

Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.

Healthcare Agencies II

Healthcare Agencies II

There are various healthcare agencies in the United States—some of which are managed by religious institutions and others by different government branches.
Parish nursing is a growing specialty nursing profession that focuses on holistic healthcare, health promotion, and illness prevention. It blends professional nursing practice with a health ministry, focusing on health and healing within the context of a Christian community. Parish nurses serve as health educators, referral sources,...

Torts II

Torts II

Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Congress Extends Enhanced ACA Subsidies.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2022

Same author

Supreme Court Ends Right To Abortion.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2022

Same author

Subsidy Cliff Looms; Fixing The Family Glitch.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2022

Same author

Record ACA Enrollment; 2023 Payment Rule.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2022

Same author

House Advances Build Back Better Act.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2021

Same author

ACA Changes Considered; Coverage Held Steady.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Health Policy by Litigation.

Katie Keith¹, Joel McElvain¹

¹Katie Keith, J.D., M.P.H., is an associate research professor at Georgetown University's Center on Health Insurance Reforms and teaches courses on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and LGBT health law and policy at Georgetown University Law Center. She specializes in ACA implementation and provides "Following the ACA" rapid response analysis for Health Affairs. She is an appointed consumer representative to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and maintains an active consulting practice, where she advises nonprofits and foundations on health care issues. Ms. Keith received her law degree from Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, DC and holds a Master's in Public Health from Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, Maryland. Joel McElvain, J.D., is a partner in the health care practice group of King & Spalding LLP. He previously served as an Assistant Director of the Federal Programs Branch at the U.S. Department of Justice, where he supervised the defense of litigation involving the Department of Health and Human Services. Mr. McElvain participated in the government's defense of numerous cases challenging the constitutionality or implementation of the Affordable Care Act, including National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012), and King v. Burwell, 135 S. Ct. 2480 (2015). Mr. McElvain received his law degree from Harvard Law School in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : a Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics

|October 6, 2020

Summary

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has endured many legal battles, often concerning executive power and implementation. Courts significantly influence health reform, impacting future healthcare policy directions.

More Related Videos

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report

Published on: May 30, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report

Published on: May 30, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Area of Science:

Health Law and Policy
Public Health Litigation

Background:

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been a frequent target of legal challenges since its inception.
Litigation often centers on the implementation of the law and the scope of executive authority.

Observation:

Opponents challenged the ACA during the Obama administration, while supporters used courts to counter Trump administration efforts to weaken it.
Congressional gridlock on health policy has led to increased reliance on executive actions, subsequently triggering more lawsuits.

Findings:

This article reviews the historical context and reasons for the persistent litigation surrounding the ACA.
It identifies potential future areas of health policy ripe for legal challenges.

Implications:

The judiciary's role in health reform is substantial, shaping the future landscape of healthcare policy.
Understanding litigation trends is crucial for navigating and influencing health policy development and reform efforts.