Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.4K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.4K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

9.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
9.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.2K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.5K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.5K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

98.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
98.7K
Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain01:26

Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain

280
Linear systems are characterized by two main properties: superposition and homogeneity. Superposition allows the response to multiple inputs to be the sum of the responses to each individual input. Homogeneity ensures that scaling an input by a scalar results in the response being scaled by the same scalar.
In contrast, nonlinear systems do not inherently possess these properties. However, for small deviations around an operating point, a nonlinear system can often be approximated as linear....
280

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deep learning-based image super-resolution in microscopy: Why more pixels do not imply higher resolving ability?

Journal of microscopy·2026
Same author

Haptic-Sound Analysis of Materials' Clustering Based on Tool Tip Tapping Exploration.

Multisensory research·2026
Same author

Saliency detection for stereoscopic images.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2014
Same author

Fourier transform based scalable image quality measure.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2012
Same author

Image quality assessment based on gradient similarity.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2011
Same author

SVD-based quality metric for image and video using machine learning.

IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics : a publication of the IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society·2011

Related Experiment Videos

Interval-Based Least Squares for Uncertainty-Aware Learning in Human-Centric Multimedia Systems.

Manish Narwaria, Aditya Tatu

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
    |October 6, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces an uncertainty-aware loss function for machine learning models in multimedia signal processing. It addresses ignored ground-truth uncertainty, improving prediction accuracy in human-centric systems.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Area of Science:

    • Multimedia Signal Processing
    • Machine Learning
    • Computer Vision

    Background:

    • Existing machine learning (ML) methods in multimedia signal processing often ignore uncertainty in ground-truth data.
    • This leads to overemphasis on single-target values, which is problematic when human feedback is inherently variable.
    • This limitation is particularly relevant in immersive multimedia systems with higher degrees of freedom and uncertainty.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose an uncertainty-aware loss function that explicitly accounts for data uncertainty.
    • To improve the optimization and validation processes in ML models by acknowledging ground-truth variability.
    • To enhance prediction accuracy in scenarios with inherent uncertainty, such as human-centric systems.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a novel uncertainty-aware loss function, denoted as [Formula: see text].
    • Integration of the proposed loss function into ML model training and validation pipelines.
    • Application and evaluation of the method on diverse multimedia tasks.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed uncertainty-aware loss function effectively reduces prediction errors.
    • Demonstrated utility in blind estimation of perceptual quality for audiovisual signals, panoramic images, and distorted images.
    • Experimental results validate the theoretical benefits of accounting for data uncertainty.

    Conclusions:

    • The novel loss function offers a more robust approach to ML in multimedia signal processing by handling ground-truth uncertainty.
    • The method is particularly beneficial for modern applications like crowdsourcing and immersive systems where uncertainty is high.
    • This work provides a valuable tool for developing more accurate and reliable ML models in the presence of data variability.