Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation01:20

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation

6.9K
Cell separation was first achieved in 1964 by S. H. Seal, who separated large tumor cells from the smaller blood cells using filtration. Two years later, Pohl and Hawk performed experiments on how cells respond differently to a nonuniform electric field based on the cell type. Such observations were the inception of cell separation methods, which allow isolating a single cell type from a heterogeneous sample.
6.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Complete genome sequence of Brucella melitensis 133, an isolate of biovar 1 of sequence type 32.

Journal of bacteriology·2012
Same author

The role of prolactin receptor in GH signaling in breast cancer cells.

Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.)·2012
Same author

Green tea powder and Lactobacillus plantarum affect gut microbiota, lipid metabolism and inflammation in high-fat fed C57BL/6J mice.

Nutrition & metabolism·2012
Same author

[Effects of early application of Tuina treatment on quadriceps surface myoelectricity in patients after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial].

Zhong xi yi jie he xue bao = Journal of Chinese integrative medicine·2012
Same author

A minimally invasive postero-medial approach with suture anchors for isolated tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament.

The Knee·2012
Same author

The chloride channel/transporter Slc26a9 regulates the systemic arterial pressure and renal chloride excretion.

Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

A Microfluidic Platform for Precision Small-volume Sample Processing and Its Use to Size Separate Biological Particles with an Acoustic Microdevice
11:32

A Microfluidic Platform for Precision Small-volume Sample Processing and Its Use to Size Separate Biological Particles with an Acoustic Microdevice

Published on: November 23, 2015

14.2K

Acoustic Microfluidic Separation Techniques and Bioapplications: A Review.

Yuan Gao1, Mengren Wu1, Yang Lin2

  • 1Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.

Micromachines
|October 7, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Acoustic microfluidic separation offers a label-free, biocompatible method for isolating micro/nanoscale particles, especially biological samples. Despite challenges like low throughput, advancements pave the way for commercialized, integrated devices.

Keywords:
BAWSAWacoustic separation techniquesbioapplicationsmicrofluidics

More Related Videos

Microfluidic Acoustophoresis for Flowthrough Separation of Gram-Negative Bacteria using Aptamer Affinity Beads
06:08

Microfluidic Acoustophoresis for Flowthrough Separation of Gram-Negative Bacteria using Aptamer Affinity Beads

Published on: October 17, 2022

2.8K
Fabrication and Operation of Acoustofluidic Devices Supporting Bulk Acoustic Standing Waves for Sheathless Focusing of Particles
10:14

Fabrication and Operation of Acoustofluidic Devices Supporting Bulk Acoustic Standing Waves for Sheathless Focusing of Particles

Published on: March 6, 2016

13.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

A Microfluidic Platform for Precision Small-volume Sample Processing and Its Use to Size Separate Biological Particles with an Acoustic Microdevice
11:32

A Microfluidic Platform for Precision Small-volume Sample Processing and Its Use to Size Separate Biological Particles with an Acoustic Microdevice

Published on: November 23, 2015

14.2K
Microfluidic Acoustophoresis for Flowthrough Separation of Gram-Negative Bacteria using Aptamer Affinity Beads
06:08

Microfluidic Acoustophoresis for Flowthrough Separation of Gram-Negative Bacteria using Aptamer Affinity Beads

Published on: October 17, 2022

2.8K
Fabrication and Operation of Acoustofluidic Devices Supporting Bulk Acoustic Standing Waves for Sheathless Focusing of Particles
10:14

Fabrication and Operation of Acoustofluidic Devices Supporting Bulk Acoustic Standing Waves for Sheathless Focusing of Particles

Published on: March 6, 2016

13.3K

Area of Science:

  • Microfluidics
  • Acoustic Separation Technology
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Microfluidic separation enables rapid, low-cost particle manipulation at the micro/nanoscale.
  • Acoustic microfluidic techniques are advantageous for biological samples due to controllability, biocompatibility, and label-free operation.
  • Current limitations include low throughput and reliance on external equipment, hindering commercialization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive review of recent advances in acoustic microfluidic separation.
  • To discuss the fundamental theory and mechanisms (bulk acoustic wave, surface acoustic wave) of acoustic separation.
  • To highlight applications, challenges, and future perspectives in the field.

Main Methods:

  • Review of fundamental theories and mechanisms of acoustic separation (bulk and surface acoustic waves).
  • Compilation and discussion of recent advancements and applications in acoustic microfluidic separation.
  • Analysis of benefits, challenges, and future outlook for commercialization.

Main Results:

  • Acoustic microfluidic separation utilizes bulk and surface acoustic waves for particle manipulation.
  • Diverse applications demonstrated, particularly for biological samples like blood cells, cancer cells, proteins, bacteria, viruses, and DNA/RNA.
  • Identified key benefits (controllability, biocompatibility) and challenges (throughput, external equipment dependency).

Conclusions:

  • Acoustic microfluidic separation is a promising technology for biological sample analysis.
  • Overcoming current limitations is crucial for developing robust, integrated, and commercialized devices.
  • Future research should focus on enhancing throughput and simplifying device integration for wider adoption.