Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sutures of the Skull01:22

Sutures of the Skull

9.5K
The human skull is composed of several bones that come together to protect the brain and support the structures of the face. The junctions where these bones meet are called sutures.
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
9.5K
Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View01:14

Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View

4.4K
The superior view of the cranium shows the frontal and paired parietal bones.
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...
4.4K
Cranial Bones: Lateral View01:27

Cranial Bones: Lateral View

4.0K
The lateral view of the cranium is dominated by temporal, sphenoid, and ethmoid bones.
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
4.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An Empirical Bayes approach for the study of phenotypic evolution from high-dimensional data.

Systematic biology·2026
Same author

A second theropod tooth from the Cauvery Basin reaffirms the presence of troodontid dinosaurs in the Cretaceous of India.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026
Same author

FGF signalling orchestrates multiple roles during salivary gland branching morphogenesis.

Developmental biology·2026
Same author

Secondary cartilage in the murine medial pterygoid plate has a critical role in the pathfinding of the tensor veli palatini.

Journal of anatomy·2026
Same author

Evaluating the Efficacy of EcoSAFE: A Superoxidized Solution With HOCl at Neutral pH for Infection Control.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Analysis of Eya1 and Tbx1 mutants highlights interactions between the muscle and developing cartilage during external ear formation.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Author Spotlight: Development and Evaluation of a Standardized Rat Model for Calvarial Suture-Bony Composite Defects
04:17

Author Spotlight: Development and Evaluation of a Standardized Rat Model for Calvarial Suture-Bony Composite Defects

Published on: May 10, 2024

1.1K

A comparison of metrics for quantifying cranial suture complexity.

Heather E White1,2,3, Julien Clavel1,4, Abigail S Tucker2

  • 1Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface
|October 7, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Comparing methods for quantifying cranial suture complexity is crucial for understanding skull evolution. This study reveals different metrics capture distinct aspects of suture morphology, guiding future research.

Keywords:
complexitymammalmorphologymorphometricsskullsuture

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: PEGASOS Tissue Clearing Technique to Visualize Bone Remodeling
06:51

Author Spotlight: PEGASOS Tissue Clearing Technique to Visualize Bone Remodeling

Published on: August 18, 2023

1.9K
Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

674

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Author Spotlight: Development and Evaluation of a Standardized Rat Model for Calvarial Suture-Bony Composite Defects
04:17

Author Spotlight: Development and Evaluation of a Standardized Rat Model for Calvarial Suture-Bony Composite Defects

Published on: May 10, 2024

1.1K
Author Spotlight: PEGASOS Tissue Clearing Technique to Visualize Bone Remodeling
06:51

Author Spotlight: PEGASOS Tissue Clearing Technique to Visualize Bone Remodeling

Published on: August 18, 2023

1.9K
Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

674

Area of Science:

  • Paleontology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Cranial sutures are vital for skull development and function.
  • Suture morphology is highly variable, yet complexity quantification lacks consensus.
  • Previous studies have seldom explored suture complexity quantitatively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively compare existing methods for quantifying cranial suture morphology.
  • To evaluate the suitability of different complexity metrics for comparative analyses.
  • To identify the most effective metrics for analyzing suture variation in mammals.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzed 2D suture outlines from 79 extinct and extant mammal species.
  • Compared five complexity metrics: sinuosity index (SI), suture complexity index (SCI), fractal dimension (FD) box counting, FD madogram, and power spectrum density (PSD).
  • Assessed how each metric relates to overall shape variation and specific sutural features.

Main Results:

  • The primary axis of shape variation did not solely represent complexity.
  • Each complexity metric captured different facets of suture morphology.
  • PSD effectively discriminated features like looping and interdigitation; SCI excelled at quantifying interdigitation number.

Conclusions:

  • Selecting an appropriate complexity metric is essential for accurate comparative analyses of suture variation.
  • Future research should choose metrics based on the specific attributes of interest (e.g., interdigitation, looping).
  • This work provides a framework for robust quantitative studies on cranial suture evolution and function.