Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Intracellular Phosphoflow Cytometry of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenotransplants
Published on: June 6, 2025
Ivosidenib or enasidenib combined with intensive chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed AML: a phase 1 study
Eytan M Stein1, Courtney D DiNardo2, Amir T Fathi3
1Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Abstract:
Ivosidenib (AG-120) and enasidenib (AG-221) are targeted oral inhibitors of the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (mIDH) 1 and 2 enzymes, respectively. Given their effectiveness as single agents in mIDH1/2 relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), this phase 1 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ivosidenib or enasidenib combined with intensive chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed mIDH1/2 AML. Ivosidenib 500 mg once daily and enasidenib 100 mg once daily were well tolerated in this setting, with safety profiles generally consistent with those of induction and consolidation chemotherapy alone. The frequency of IDH differentiation syndrome was low, as expected given the concurrent administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy. In patients receiving ivosidenib, the frequency and grades of QT interval prolongation were similar to those observed with ivosidenib monotherapy. Increases in total bilirubin were more frequently observed in patients treated with enasidenib, consistent with this inhibitor's known potential to inhibit UGT1A1, but did not appear to have significant clinical consequences. In patients receiving ivosidenib (n = 60) or enasidenib (n = 91), end-of-induction complete remission (CR) rates were 55% and 47%, respectively, and CR/CR with incomplete neutrophil or platelet recovery (CR/CRi/CRp) rates were 72% and 63%, respectively. In patients with a best overall response of CR/CRi/CRp, 16/41 (39%) receiving ivosidenib had IDH1 mutation clearance and 15/64 (23%) receiving enasidenib had IDH2 mutation clearance by digital polymerase chain reaction; furthermore, 16/20 (80%) and 10/16 (63%), respectively, became negative for measurable residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02632708.
Insights
This phase 1 study found that combining targeted mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (mIDH) inhibitors ivosidenib or enasidenib with chemotherapy is safe for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The combination therapy demonstrated promising complete remission rates and mutation clearance in AML patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Hematology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (mIDH) 1 and 2 inhibitors, ivosidenib and enasidenib, show efficacy as monotherapy for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
- Combining targeted therapies with intensive chemotherapy may improve outcomes for newly diagnosed AML patients with mIDH mutations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining ivosidenib or enasidenib with intensive chemotherapy in newly diagnosed mIDH1/2 AML.
- To assess the tolerability and clinical outcomes of this combination therapy.
Main Methods:
- Phase 1 study enrolling patients with newly diagnosed mIDH1/2 AML.
- Patients received either ivosidenib (500 mg daily) or enasidenib (100 mg daily) concurrently with intensive chemotherapy.
- Safety, complete remission (CR) rates, CR with incomplete recovery (CRi/CRp) rates, mutation clearance, and measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity were assessed.
Main Results:
- The combination therapy was well-tolerated, with safety profiles consistent with standard chemotherapy.
- Low rates of IDH differentiation syndrome were observed.
- End-of-induction CR rates were 55% for ivosidenib and 47% for enasidenib; CR/CRi/CRp rates were 72% and 63%, respectively.
- Mutation clearance and MRD negativity were achieved in a significant proportion of patients.
Conclusions:
- Combining ivosidenib or enasidenib with intensive chemotherapy is a safe and potentially effective strategy for newly diagnosed mIDH1/2 AML.
- This approach warrants further investigation in larger clinical trials for AML treatment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Phenothiazines, such as prochlorperazine...

