Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Cardiovascular Risk and Statin Eligibility in Primary Prevention: A Comparison between the Brazilian and the AHA/ACC
Fernando H Y Cesena1, Viviane A Valente1, Raul D Santos1,2
1Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP - Brasil.
Insights
The Brazilian dyslipidemia guideline identifies more patients as high-risk and eligible for statin therapy compared to the AHA/ACC guideline. This highlights significant differences in cardiovascular risk stratification and treatment recommendations between the two guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Preventive Medicine
- Clinical Guidelines
Background:
- Current cardiovascular disease prevention strategies rely on guidelines for risk stratification and treatment.
- The Brazilian Guideline on Dyslipidemias and the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) Cholesterol Guideline offer different approaches to managing dyslipidemia.
- Direct comparisons of these guidelines' impact on risk assessment and statin eligibility in primary prevention are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare cardiovascular risk categorization between the Brazilian and AHA/ACC guidelines.
- To evaluate differences in statin eligibility for primary prevention patients based on these two guidelines.
- To identify potential discrepancies in clinical decision-making for lipid management.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 18,525 individuals aged 40-74 years without high-risk conditions.
- Cardiovascular risk stratification performed using both Brazilian and AHA/ACC guideline criteria.
- Statin eligibility determined by comparing LDL-c levels and 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk scores.
Main Results:
- The Brazilian guideline categorized over 80% of intermediate/high-risk individuals into lower-risk categories under the AHA/ACC guideline.
- Statin eligibility was significantly higher under the Brazilian guideline: 45% for men and 16% for women, versus 16% and 1% respectively for AHA/ACC.
- A substantial proportion (82% of women, 57% of men) eligible by Brazilian criteria were not eligible by AHA/ACC criteria.
Conclusions:
- The Brazilian guideline designates a greater proportion of primary prevention patients as higher risk compared to the AHA/ACC guideline.
- The Brazilian guideline leads to substantially increased statin eligibility in primary prevention populations.
- These findings underscore significant differences in risk assessment and statin initiation recommendations between the two major guidelines.
Background:
Differences between the updated versions of the Brazilian Guideline on Dyslipidemias and the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) Cholesterol Guideline regarding cardiovascular risk stratification and statin eligibility are unknown.
Objectives:
To compare cardiovascular risk categorization and statin eligibility based on the Brazilian guideline with those based on the AHA/ACC guideline in primary prevention patients.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed individuals aged 40-74 years without high-risk conditions, with LDL-c 70 to < 190 mg/dL, not on lipid-lowering drugs, who underwent routine clinical assessment. Cardiovascular risk was stratified according to the Brazilian and the AHA/ACC guidelines. Subjects were considered eligible for statin therapy if LDL-c was at least 30 mg/dL above the target for the cardiovascular risk (Brazilian guideline) or the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk was ≥7.5% (AHA/ACC guideline). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
The study sample consisted of 18,525 subjects (69% male, age 48 ± 6 years). Among subjects considered at intermediate or high risk by the Brazilian guideline, over 80% would be in a lower risk category by the AHA/ACC guideline. Among men, 45% and 16% would be statin eligible by the Brazilian and the AHA/ACC guidelines criteria, respectively (p < 0.001). Among women, the respective proportions would be 16% and 1% (p < 0.001). Eighty-two percent of women and 57% of men eligible for statins based on the Brazilian guideline criterion would not be eligible according to the AHA/ACC guideline criterion.
Conclusions:
Compared with the AHA/ACC guideline, the Brazilian guideline classifies a larger proportion of primary prevention patients into higher-risk categories and substantially increases statin eligibility. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115(3):440-449).
More Related Videos
13:07Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Relative Risk
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents