Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

07:42
A Data-Driven Approach to Quantifying Immune States in Sepsis
Published on: February 7, 2025
407
Mortality difference between early-identified sepsis and late-identified sepsis
Woon Jee1, Sion Jo2,3,4, Jae Baek Lee2,3
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
|October 8, 2020
Summary
Early identification of sepsis, despite initial assumptions, is linked to higher mortality rates. This study found that patients with early-identified sepsis had a significantly greater risk of in-hospital death compared to those with late-identified sepsis.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Sepsis remains a leading cause of hospital mortality worldwide.
- Timely identification and treatment are crucial for improving sepsis outcomes.
- The clinical implications of early versus late sepsis identification require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare in-hospital mortality rates between patients with early-identified sepsis and late-identified sepsis.
- To analyze clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with early sepsis identification.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 204 emergency department patients diagnosed with sepsis.
- Early-identified sepsis defined by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥2 within one hour of admission.
- Late-identified sepsis included all other sepsis patients; primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.
Main Results:
- 113 patients (55.4%) had early-identified sepsis, with a significantly higher mortality rate (23.0%) compared to late-identified sepsis (6.6%).
- Early-identified sepsis patients presented with higher SOFA and APACHE II scores.
- Patients with early-identified sepsis were more likely to progress to septic shock and require intensive care unit admission.
Conclusions:
- Mortality was significantly higher in the early-identified sepsis group compared to the late-identified sepsis group.
- These findings challenge the assumption that earlier sepsis identification universally leads to better outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Actuarial Approach
217
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
217
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
451
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
451
Kaplan-Meier Approach
443
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
443

