Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
Stress myocardial perfusion with qualitative magnetic resonance and quantitative dynamic computed tomography:
Martina C de Knegt1,2,3, Alexia Rossi1,2, Steffen E Petersen1,2
1Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Insights
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion and quantitative CT perfusion imaging are effective for diagnosing significant coronary artery disease (CAD). These methods offer incremental diagnostic value when combined with cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular imaging
- Diagnostic accuracy
- Coronary artery disease
Background:
- Non-invasive imaging like cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion and computed tomography (CT) perfusion can aid in assessing coronary artery disease (CAD).
- These techniques may help select patients for invasive coronary angiography (ICA).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of qualitative CMR perfusion and quantitative CT perfusion.
- To assess their incremental value when used alongside cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
- To diagnose haemodynamically significant CAD using fractional flow reserve (FFR) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as references.
Main Methods:
- Patients with stable angina pectoris underwent CCTA, qualitative CMR perfusion, visual CT perfusion, and quantitative relative myocardial blood flow (CT-MBF) assessment.
- FFR was measured in vessels with 30-90% stenosis on ICA.
- Haemodynamically significant CAD was defined by FFR <0.80 or QCA ≥80%.
Main Results:
- Visual CMR perfusion (AUC 0.84) and relative CT-MBF (AUC 0.86) showed comparable diagnostic performance, outperforming visual CT perfusion (AUC 0.64).
- Combining CCTA with visual CMR perfusion (AUC 0.91) or relative CT-MBF (AUC 0.92) significantly improved CAD discrimination compared to CCTA alone (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Qualitative CMR perfusion and relative CT-MBF are superior to visual CT perfusion for diagnosing haemodynamically significant CAD.
- These imaging modalities provide added diagnostic discrimination when used in conjunction with CCTA.
Aims:
Assessment of haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (CAD) using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging perfusion or dynamic stress myocardial perfusion imaging by computed tomography (CT perfusion) may aid patient selection for invasive coronary angiography (ICA). We evaluated the diagnostic performance and incremental value of qualitative CMR perfusion and quantitative CT perfusion complementary to cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the diagnosis of haemodynamically significant CAD using fractional flow reserve (FFR) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as reference standard.
Methods And Results:
CCTA, qualitative visual CMR perfusion, visual CT perfusion, and quantitative relative myocardial blood flow (CT-MBF) were performed in patients with stable angina pectoris. FFR was measured in coronary vessels with stenosis visually estimated between 30% and 90% diameter reduction on ICA. Haemodynamically significant CAD was defined as FFR <0.80, or QCA ≥80% in those cases where FFR could not be performed. A total of 218 vessels from 93 patients were assessed. An optimal cut-off of 0.72 for relative CT-MBF was determined. The diagnostic performances (area under the receiver-operating characteristics curves, 95% CI) of visual CMR perfusion (0.84, 0.77-0.90) and relative CT-MBF (0.86, 0.81-0.92) were comparable and outperformed visual CT perfusion (0.64, 0.57-0.71). In combination with CCTA ≥50%, CCTA + visual CMR perfusion (0.91, 0.86-0.96), CCTA + relative CT-MBF (0.92, 0.88-0.96), and CCTA + visual CT perfusion (0.82, 0.75-0.90) improved discrimination compared with CCTA alone (all P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Visual CMR perfusion and relative CT-MBF outperformed visual CT perfusion and provided incremental discrimination compared with CCTA alone for the diagnosis of haemodynamically significant CAD.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

