Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
[Investigation into medical disciplinary law critically examined]
J F Hamming1,2
1LUMC, afd. Heelkunde, Leiden.
Abstract:
There is a suggestion that the medical disciplinary committees (MDC) in the Netherlands are making more severe rulings on medical professionals. In a 10-year analysis of MDC rulings, it appears that complaints made by patients are more frequently being judged to be well-founded, and that the measures being taken are more severe. The authors conclude that there is a numerical basis for the increasing severity of the rulings. However, a numerical trend as such does not constitute proof of this, as the way in which the ruling is arrived at is unknown. A more thorough analysis of the patient complaints, the ruling and the underlying arguments is necessary. The authors also make some other statements that can be refuted. The importance of the possible influence of the increasing complexity of health care as a factor in the increase in complaints to the MDC is not addressed.
Related Concept Videos
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Obedience
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...
Sources of Law
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
Torts I
Intentional...

