Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

77
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
77
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

3.9K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
3.9K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

42.7K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.7K
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

153
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
153
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

64.1K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
64.1K
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

948
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
948

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Limited evidence of test-retest reliability in infant-directed speech preference in a large preregistered infant experiment.

Developmental science·2024
Same author

Do judges prefer advisors with dependent or independent errors? Investigating judges' advice selection and advice weighting.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2021
Same author

Does change of responsibility reduce escalating commitment? A replication and theoretical extension.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2021
Same author

A test of synergy in dynamic system control tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2020
Same author

Effects of process and outcome accountability on escalating commitment: A two-study replication.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
10:09

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

13.5K

G-I transfer in multicue judgment tasks: Discussion improves group members' knowledge about target relations.

Matthias Lippold1, Stefan Schulz-Hardt1, Thomas Schultze1

  • 1Department of Economic and Social Psychology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|October 8, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Group work enhances individual accuracy through group-to-individual transfer (G-I transfer), improving both metric and mapping knowledge. This learning process leads to synergistic group performance in quantitative judgments.

More Related Videos

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.8K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
10:09

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

13.5K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.8K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Group work offers benefits like learning from peers, termed group-to-individual transfer (G-I transfer).
  • G-I transfer in quantitative judgments enhances individual accuracy and creates synergy, where groups outperform individuals.
  • The specific knowledge gained during G-I transfer remains underexplored, particularly concerning metric and mapping knowledge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the nature of knowledge gained through G-I transfer in quantitative judgment tasks.
  • To test whether G-I transfer improves group members' mapping knowledge, a type of knowledge not previously shown to benefit from group discussion.
  • To determine if G-I transfer enhances both metric and mapping knowledge.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a multicue judgment task to assess G-I transfer.
  • Compared the performance and knowledge of participants working in interacting groups versus those working individually.
  • Employed two experiments to validate the findings on G-I transfer and its impact on knowledge.

Main Results:

  • Individuals working in groups demonstrated superior accuracy compared to those working individually.
  • Group interaction led to significant improvements in both metric knowledge (understanding plausible value ranges) and mapping knowledge (understanding relative magnitudes).
  • The findings provide evidence that G-I transfer positively impacts both types of knowledge.

Conclusions:

  • Group-to-individual transfer in quantitative judgments enhances both metric and mapping knowledge.
  • Interacting groups foster learning that improves individual members' understanding of value ranges and relative magnitudes.
  • This study demonstrates that G-I transfer contributes to synergy by improving individual knowledge components crucial for accurate judgments.