Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025
Evaluation of Capnography Sampling Line Compatibility and Accuracy when Used with a Portable Capnography Monitor
Published on: September 29, 2020
Quantitative systematic review: Sources of inaccuracy in manually measured adult respiratory rate data
Noa Kallioinen1,2, Andrew Hill1,3,4, Melany J Christofidis1,5
1School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Aims:
To identify the potential sources of inaccuracy in manually measured adult respiratory rate (RR) data and quantify their effects.
Design:
Quantitative systematic review with meta-analyses where appropriate.
Data Sources:
Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library (from database inception to 31 July 2019).
Review Methods:
Studies presenting data on individual sources of inaccuracy in the manual measurement of adult RR were analysed, assessed for quality, and grouped according to the source of inaccuracy investigated. Quantitative data were extracted and synthesized and meta-analyses performed where appropriate.
Results:
Included studies (N = 49) identified five sources of inaccuracy. The awareness effect creates an artefactual reduction in actual RR, and observation methods involving shorter counts cause systematic underscoring. Individual RR measurements can differ substantially in either direction between observations due to inter- or intra-observer variability. Value bias, where particular RRs are over-represented (suggesting estimation), is a widespread problem. Recording omission is also widespread, with higher average rates in inpatient versus triage/admission contexts.
Conclusion:
This review demonstrates that manually measured RR data are subject to several potential sources of inaccuracy.
Impact:
RR is an important indicator of clinical deterioration and commonly included in track-and-trigger systems. However, the usefulness of RR data depends on the accuracy of the observations and documentation, which are subject to five potential sources of inaccuracy identified in this review. A single measurement may be affected by several factors. Hence, clinicians should interpret recorded RR data cautiously unless systems are in place to ensure its accuracy. For nurses, this includes counting rather than estimating RRs, employing 60-s counts whenever possible, ensuring patients are unaware that their RR is being measured, and documenting the resulting value. For any given site, interventions to improve measurement should take into account the local organizational and cultural context, available resources, and the specific measurement issues that need to be addressed.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
01:19Special considerations while measuring oxygen saturation
Ensuring accuracy in vital sign recordings while prioritizing patient comfort and minimizing anxiety is...
01:26Respiratory Volumes and Capacities I
01:25Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
01:29Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
01:27Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection
Chest Configuration
The chest configuration...