Systematic review of rigid and flexible esophagoscopy for pediatric esophageal foreign bodies
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children
Published on: September 11, 2018
Weining Yang1, Daniel Milad2, Nikolaus E Wolter1
1Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Insights
Rigid and flexible esophagoscopy show similar safety and effectiveness for removing esophageal foreign bodies in children. Both procedures offer high success rates with comparable complication risks for pediatric EFB retrieval.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Otolaryngology
- Pediatric Surgery
Background:
- Esophageal foreign body (EFB) is a frequent pediatric hospital admission.
- Rigid and flexible esophagoscopy are standard EFB removal techniques.
- This review compares the efficacy and safety of both esophagoscopy methods in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare the success and complication rates of rigid versus flexible esophagoscopy for pediatric esophageal foreign body retrieval.
- To evaluate the overall quality of evidence for these procedures.
- To inform clinical decision-making regarding the optimal endoscopic approach.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search across major databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CINAHL).
- Independent review of 74 abstracts by two authors.
- Inclusion of studies reporting success rates for rigid and flexible esophagoscopy in pediatric EFB retrieval.
- Assessment of evidence quality using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Main Results:
- Analysis of five retrospective studies (1993-2016) involving 955 pediatric patients.
- High success rates for both methods: 95.4% for rigid and 97.4% for flexible esophagoscopy.
- Similar complication rates: 2.4% for rigid and 3.4% for flexible esophagoscopy.
- No statistically significant differences in retrieval success (OR=1.9) or complications (OR=0.9) between rigid and flexible esophagoscopy.
- Coins and food boluses were the most common esophageal foreign bodies.
Conclusions:
- Flexible and rigid esophagoscopy are equally safe and effective for pediatric esophageal foreign body removal.
- The choice of modality can depend on institutional policies and available resources.
- Consultation with otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, or pediatric surgeons is appropriate based on local practice.
Background:
Esophageal foreign body (EFB) is a common presentation in pediatric hospitals. Rigid and flexible esophagoscopy are both primary modalities used for EFB removal. By systematically reviewing the literature, we sought to assess success and complication rates of both rigid and flexible esophagoscopy in pediatric EFB retrieval.
Methods:
A systematic search of the literature was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, CINAHL. Two authors independently reviewed 74 abstracts and included studies that documented success rates of flexible and rigid esophagoscopy for EFB retrieval. The certainty and quality of the overall body of evidence was evaluated in accordance with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
Results:
Five retrospective chart reviews published between 1993 and 2016 identified 955 patients with a mean age of 4.2 (range 3.2-5.3 years). Foreign bodies were localized to the upper esophagus in 69.6%, middle esophagus in 13.0% and lower esophagus in 11.5%. Coins (82.1%) and food boluses (8.5%) comprised the majority of EFB. The success rate of foreign body retrieval was 95.4% with rigid esophagoscopy and 97.4% with flexible esophagoscopy. Complication rates were 2.4% for rigid esophagoscopy and 3.4% for flexible esophagoscopy. Rates of successful foreign body retrieval (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9 [95% CI 0.9-3.8; p = 0.07]) and complications (OR = 0.9 [95% CI 0.3-2.3; p = 0.79]) were not significantly different across modalities. There were no mortalities in any of the studies analyzed.
Conclusion:
Flexible and rigid esophagoscopy are equally safe and effective for the retrieval of EFB in children. Otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, and pediatric general surgeons can be consulted for foreign body retrieval depending on institutional policies and resource availability.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
Endoscopic Studies I: Bronchoscopy and Thoracoscopy
Bronchoscopy
Description
Bronchoscopy is a procedure that involves direct visualization of the larynx, trachea, and bronchi for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. A flexible fiber optic or rigid bronchoscope is used to carry out the procedure. The fiber-optic bronchoscope is more frequently used due...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...

