Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

The Portable Chemical Sterilizer PCS, D-FENS, and D-FEND ALL: Novel Chlorine Dioxide Decontamination Technologies for the Military
Published on: June 29, 2014
Evaluating method and potential risks of chlorine-resistant bacteria (CRB): A review
Li-Wei Luo1, Yin-Hu Wu1, Tong Yu2
1Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control State Key Joint Laboratory, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Microorganism Application and Risk Control (SMARC), School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Chlorine-resistant bacteria (CRB) pose risks beyond pathogenicity, including microbial growth in water systems. A standardized method is needed to evaluate CRB resistance and identify these resilient microbes.
Area of Science:
- Environmental microbiology
- Water treatment technologies
- Bacterial resistance mechanisms
Background:
- Chlorine-resistant bacteria (CRB) can survive and regrow despite chlorine disinfection, posing risks including pathogenicity, antibiotic resistance, and microbial growth.
- While pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance of CRB receive attention, their microbial growth risks in water treatment and reclamation systems are often overlooked.
- Existing methods for evaluating chlorine resistance lack standardization, hindering comparative analysis of CRB strains across studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and analyze the risks associated with CRB, emphasizing microbial growth.
- To summarize and evaluate methods used for assessing bacterial chlorine resistance.
- To propose a standardized method for evaluating chlorine resistance and identifying CRB.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies on chlorine-resistant bacteria and their resistance evaluation methods.
- Analysis of reported CRB genera, sources, and chlorine resistance levels.
- Synthesis of current evaluation methods to propose a standardized approach.
Main Results:
- Among 44 CRB strains from 17 genera, Mycobacterium, Bacillus, Legionella, Pseudomonas, and Sphingomonas were most frequently reported.
- Most frequently isolated CRB genera are pathogenic or opportunistic pathogens.
- Information on chlorine resistance levels is often limited to species or strain level, with genus-level differences poorly understood.
Conclusions:
- A standardized method using logarithmic removal rate and E. coli as a reference strain is proposed for evaluating CRB.
- The proposed method aims to provide a common range of chlorine resistance for bacterial genera, aiding in environmental distribution analysis.
- Standardization is crucial for consistent identification and comparison of CRB, addressing risks in water treatment and reclamation.
More Related Videos
07:07Controlled-release of Chlorine Dioxide in a Perforated Packaging System to Extend the Storage Life and Improve the Safety of Grape Tomatoes
Published on: April 7, 2017
09:02A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens
Published on: June 7, 2017