Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
Published on: September 20, 2024
Machine learning and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk prediction in a multi-ethnic population
Andrew Ward1, Ashish Sarraju2, Sukyung Chung3,4
1Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Insights
Machine learning (ML) models show improved atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk prediction in diverse populations, including those outside traditional guidelines. These advanced models enhance risk assessment for broader patient groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Medical Informatics
- Machine Learning in Healthcare
Background:
- The Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk prediction have limitations in diverse populations, including Asian and Hispanic individuals, and for patients with out-of-range or missing variables.
- The performance of machine learning (ML) models in improving ASCVD risk prediction across broader, real-world, multi-ethnic populations remains largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models for predicting 5-year ASCVD risk in a multi-ethnic cohort using electronic health record (EHR) data.
- To compare the performance of ML models against the traditional Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), particularly in populations excluded or underserved by PCE.
Main Methods:
- Developed and trained various ML models (logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting machine [GBM], extreme gradient boosting) on a large EHR database from Northern California.
- Included 262,923 patients aged 18+, stratified into PCE-eligible and PCE-ineligible groups, with analysis of Asian and Hispanic subgroups.
- Assessed 5-year ASCVD risk prediction performance using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), with and without additional EHR variables.
Main Results:
- The Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model demonstrated superior performance (AUC 0.835) in the full multi-ethnic cohort, including PCE-ineligible patients, compared to the PCE (AUC 0.775) in the eligible cohort.
- ML models achieved comparable or improved ASCVD risk prediction accuracy across diverse patient groups, including those with missing or out-of-range variables for PCE.
- GBM performance remained robust even after incorporating additional EHR data for patients aged 40-79.
Conclusions:
- Electronic health record-trained machine learning models offer a promising approach to enhance ASCVD risk prediction accuracy and equity in diverse, real-world populations.
- ML models can effectively bridge existing gaps in cardiovascular risk assessment, particularly for patients not well-represented by current risk prediction tools like the PCE.
Abstract:
The pooled cohort equations (PCE) predict atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in patients with characteristics within prespecified ranges and has uncertain performance among Asians or Hispanics. It is unknown if machine learning (ML) models can improve ASCVD risk prediction across broader diverse, real-world populations. We developed ML models for ASCVD risk prediction for multi-ethnic patients using an electronic health record (EHR) database from Northern California. Our cohort included patients aged 18 years or older with no prior CVD and not on statins at baseline (n = 262,923), stratified by PCE-eligible (n = 131,721) or PCE-ineligible patients based on missing or out-of-range variables. We trained ML models [logistic regression with L2 penalty and L1 lasso penalty, random forest, gradient boosting machine (GBM), extreme gradient boosting] and determined 5-year ASCVD risk prediction, including with and without incorporation of additional EHR variables, and in Asian and Hispanic subgroups. A total of 4309 patients had ASCVD events, with 2077 in PCE-ineligible patients. GBM performance in the full cohort, including PCE-ineligible patients (area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.835, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.825-0.846), was significantly better than that of the PCE in the PCE-eligible cohort (AUC 0.775, 95% CI: 0.755-0.794). Among patients aged 40-79, GBM performed similarly before (AUC 0.784, 95% CI: 0.759-0.808) and after (AUC 0.790, 95% CI: 0.765-0.814) incorporating additional EHR data. Overall, ML models achieved comparable or improved performance compared to the PCE while allowing risk discrimination in a larger group of patients including PCE-ineligible patients. EHR-trained ML models may help bridge important gaps in ASCVD risk prediction.
More Related Videos
09:06Quantitative Analysis of Cellular Composition in Advanced Atherosclerotic Lesions of Smooth Muscle Cell Lineage-Tracing Mice
Published on: February 20, 2019
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures