Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Buffer Effectiveness02:19

Buffer Effectiveness

54.1K
Buffer solutions do not have an unlimited capacity to keep the pH relatively constant . Instead, the ability of a buffer solution to resist changes in pH relies on the presence of appreciable amounts of its conjugate weak acid-base pair. When enough strong acid or base is added to substantially lower the concentration of either member of the buffer pair, the buffering action within the solution is compromised.
The buffer capacity is the amount of acid or base that can be added to a given volume...
54.1K
Buffers: Buffer Capacity01:09

Buffers: Buffer Capacity

2.0K
Buffer capacity is the quantitative measure of a buffer to resist the change in pH. As shown in the following equation, the buffer capacity, denoted by 'beta', is expressed as the number of moles of acid or base needed to change the pH of a one-liter buffer solution by 1 unit. Here, Ca and Cb indicate the number of moles of acid and base, respectively. Note that dpH represents the change in pH.
In the graph, pH is plotted as a function of the number of moles of base (Cb) added to a weak...
2.0K
Buffers02:56

Buffers

171.0K
A solution containing appreciable amounts of a weak conjugate acid-base pair is called a buffer solution, or a buffer. Buffer solutions resist a change in pH when small amounts of a strong acid or a strong base are added. A solution of acetic acid and sodium acetate is an example of a buffer that consists of a weak acid and its salt: CH3COOH (aq) + CH3COONa (aq). An example of a buffer that consists of a weak base and its salt is a solution of ammonia and ammonium chloride: NH3 (aq) + NH4Cl...
171.0K
Buffer Systems in the Body01:19

Buffer Systems in the Body

3.2K
Chemical buffers play a critical role in the body's regulation of pH levels. These systems contain one or more compounds that stabilize pH changes by neutralizing strong acids or bases. When pH levels drop, hydrogen ions bind to a weak base; when pH levels rise, hydrogen ions are released. This dynamic process helps maintain pH within a narrow and stable range essential for normal physiological function.
A typical buffer system in bodily fluids includes a weak acid and its corresponding...
3.2K
Buffers: Overview01:30

Buffers: Overview

8.3K
Buffers play a crucial role in stabilizing the pH of a solution by mitigating the effects of small amounts of added acid or base. They consist of a weak acid and its conjugate base or a weak base and its conjugate acid. A solution of acetic acid and sodium acetate is an example of a buffer that consists of a weak acid and its salt: CH3COOH (aq) + CH3COONa (aq). An example of a buffer that consists of a weak base and its salt is a solution of ammonia and ammonium chloride: NH3 (aq) + NH4Cl (aq).
8.3K
Rapidly Varying Flow01:24

Rapidly Varying Flow

303
Rapidly varying flow (RVF) in open channels is characterized by abrupt changes in flow depth over a short distance, with the rate of depth change relative to distance often approaching unity. These flows are inherently complex due to their transient and multi-dimensional nature, making exact analysis difficult. However, approximate solutions using simplified models provide valuable insights into their behavior.Key Features of Rapidly Varying FlowRVF is commonly observed in scenarios involving...
303

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cover crop implementation strategies differentially impact in-field and downstream ecosystem service provisioning: A regional case study.

Journal of environmental quality·2026
Same author

Neonicotinoid and s-triazine pesticide transport dynamics in a small karst agricultural watershed.

Journal of environmental quality·2026
Same author

Systems approach to nitrogen modeling in the Chesapeake Bay: Advancing production chain analysis under future changes.

Journal of environmental quality·2026
Same author

Comparison of Efficacy Between Lymphoplasmapheresis and Plasma Exchange in Myasthenic Crisis.

Muscle & nerve·2025
Same author

A novel Wnt/β-catenin signaling gene signature for progression and metastasis of gastric cancer.

Oncology research·2025
Same author

Heterocyclic Conjugated Polydentate Ligands Facilitate Interfacial Charge Transfer of Air-Processed Carbon-Based All Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells with an Efficiency Over 15.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Microfluidic Buffer Exchange for Interference-free Micro/Nanoparticle Cell Engineering
10:27

Microfluidic Buffer Exchange for Interference-free Micro/Nanoparticle Cell Engineering

Published on: July 10, 2016

9.5K

Riparian buffer effectiveness as a function of buffer design and input loads.

Fei Jiang1, Heather E Preisendanz2, Tamie L Veith3

  • 1Ecosystem Sciences and Management Dep., Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Journal of Environmental Quality
|October 12, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Flexible riparian buffer designs, incorporating varied widths and harvesting, can meet water quality goals without significantly impacting nutrient and sediment reduction. Focusing on mass reduction enhances watershed targeting for improved water quality.

More Related Videos

Challenges in Rheological Characterization of Highly Concentrated Suspensions — A Case Study for Screen-printing Silver Pastes
08:42

Challenges in Rheological Characterization of Highly Concentrated Suspensions — A Case Study for Screen-printing Silver Pastes

Published on: April 10, 2017

20.4K
Optimized Procedure for Determining the Adsorption of Phosphonates onto Granular Ferric Hydroxide using a Miniaturized Phosphorus Determination Method
08:21

Optimized Procedure for Determining the Adsorption of Phosphonates onto Granular Ferric Hydroxide using a Miniaturized Phosphorus Determination Method

Published on: May 18, 2018

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Microfluidic Buffer Exchange for Interference-free Micro/Nanoparticle Cell Engineering
10:27

Microfluidic Buffer Exchange for Interference-free Micro/Nanoparticle Cell Engineering

Published on: July 10, 2016

9.5K
Challenges in Rheological Characterization of Highly Concentrated Suspensions — A Case Study for Screen-printing Silver Pastes
08:42

Challenges in Rheological Characterization of Highly Concentrated Suspensions — A Case Study for Screen-printing Silver Pastes

Published on: April 10, 2017

20.4K
Optimized Procedure for Determining the Adsorption of Phosphonates onto Granular Ferric Hydroxide using a Miniaturized Phosphorus Determination Method
08:21

Optimized Procedure for Determining the Adsorption of Phosphonates onto Granular Ferric Hydroxide using a Miniaturized Phosphorus Determination Method

Published on: May 18, 2018

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Engineering
  • Water Resource Management

Background:

  • Riparian buffers are crucial for agricultural watershed water quality, but policy constraints hinder adoption.
  • Current buffer designs lack flexibility, failing to integrate farmer needs and local conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a flexible riparian buffer design paradigm.
  • To compare the effectiveness of traditional versus flexible buffer designs on nutrient and sediment loads.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated 16 years of daily nutrient and sediment loads using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT).
  • Coupled SWAT simulations with the Riparian Ecosystem Management Model (REMM) to assess six buffer designs.
  • Evaluated buffer designs varying in width, vegetation (grass, trees), and harvesting (none, periodic, annual).

Main Results:

  • Allowing vegetation harvesting minimally impacted water quality, with <5% difference in annual average percent reductions.
  • Buffers with lower removal efficiencies removed more total mass under high input conditions.
  • Total nitrogen (TN) reduction ranged from 76-78%, total phosphorus (TP) from 51-55%, and sediment from 68%.

Conclusions:

  • Flexible buffer designs integrating farmer-preferred features are effective for water quality improvement.
  • Focusing on total mass reduction, alongside percent reduction, can optimize watershed-wide buffer implementation.
  • Findings support policy changes for more adaptable riparian buffer designs to enhance nutrient and sediment control.