Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025
Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
In vitro fosfomycin study on concordance of susceptibility testing methods against ESBL and carbapenem-resistant
Ausilia Aprile1, Guido Scalia2, Stefania Stefani1
1Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Microbiology, University of Catania, Italy.
Objectives:
The increasing emergence and diffusion of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogenic bacteria, both in hospital and community settings, is inducing clinicians to reconsider old antibiotics, such as fosfomycin, to overcome the difficulties posed by these microorganisms. Recent studies have reported good in vitro activity of fosfomycin against extended spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. The aim of this study was to assess thein vitro activity of fosfomycin by different methods against 120 clinical MDR isolates.
Methods:
Fosfomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined using the agar dilution reference method (AD), gradient test (GT), broth microdilution method (BMD), according to CLSI recommendations, and automated systems (VITEK 2 and BD Phoenix) against 85 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and 35 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli. Agreement and discrepancies between the evaluated methods and the reference method were calculated.
Results:
Fosfomycin showed very good activity against ESBL-producing E. coli (88.6%). Excellent agreement (100%) between the three (AD, BMD and GT) susceptibility methods was found for E. coli. No major errors were observed. The fosfomycin resistance rate ranged from 24% (KPC-producing) to 100% (NDM-OXA-48 co-producing) K. pneumoniae. For all carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains, categorical agreement was >90% for all methods except for VITEK 2, which was 84%.
Conclusions:
When ESBL E. coli isolates are found to be susceptible to fosfomycin with automated systems, it is not necessary to verify these results with the AD reference method; while for resistant strains, the GT can be used. In cases of KPC K. pneumoniae resistant to fosfomycin, the AD method is the only reference method.
