Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

A New Hybrid Quantitative Evaluation Model for Axillary Junctional Hemorrhage in Swine
Published on: December 6, 2024
Quick cuts: A comparative study of two tools for ring tourniquet removal
Joseph Walter1, Michael DeBoer1, Jenny Koops1
1Regions Hospital and HealthPartners, St. Paul, MN, United States of America; Critical Care Research Center, St. Paul, MN, United States of America.
Trauma shears (TS) removed entrapped rings faster and with higher satisfaction than motorized diamond disc ring cutters (MDDRC). This emergency procedure is crucial for preventing complications from ring tourniquets.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Traumatology
- Medical Device Evaluation
Background:
- Ring tourniquets, caused by entrapped rings, can lead to severe finger swelling and complications.
- Prompt ring removal is critical in emergency situations to prevent nerve damage and other adverse outcomes.
- Existing ring removal devices lack sufficient comparative efficacy data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy, user satisfaction, and complication rates of two ring removal devices.
- To evaluate the performance of a motorized diamond disc ring cutter (MDDRC) versus ring cutters attached to trauma shears (TS).
Main Methods:
- A randomized study involving emergency medicine providers removing rings from 30 subjects.
- Ring removal time was measured for both MDDRC and TS devices.
- User and participant satisfaction, along with complications, were assessed using visual analog scales.
Main Results:
- Trauma shears (TS) demonstrated significantly faster ring removal times (7.7s) compared to MDDRC (67.0s).
- Both user and participant satisfaction scores were significantly higher with the TS device.
- Participant discomfort was significantly lower when using the TS device.
Conclusions:
- The trauma shears (TS) device is a more effective and satisfactory tool for emergency ring tourniquet removal than the MDDRC.
- This study provides the first comparative data on the efficacy and satisfaction of these two common ring removal tools.
- Faster removal and higher satisfaction suggest TS as a preferred method in emergency settings.
More Related Videos
09:24O-Ring Aortic Banding Versus Traditional Transverse Aortic Constriction for Modeling Pressure Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
Published on: October 6, 2022
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018