Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An analysis of the outcome of 2,443 women applying to be donors at a commercial egg bank in the USA.

Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E·2026
Same author

The Implications of Reducing the Number of Families per Donor Worldwide.

Andrology·2026
Same author

Risk management and the further use of gametes from a donor with a known pathogenic variant.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same author

Fertility awareness, reproductive autonomy and what people should know about having children.

The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception·2026
Same author

Coping with rejection as a sperm donor: A qualitative study of the personal impact of rejection and new health information.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Recommendations from the WHO guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infertility.

Fertility and sterility·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Fertility Preservation Through Oocyte Vitrification: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives
08:46

Fertility Preservation Through Oocyte Vitrification: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives

Published on: September 16, 2021

6.4K

Mild stimulation should be mandatory for oocyte donation.

Guido Pennings1

  • 1Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
|October 13, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Oocyte donation risks are primarily due to high hormonal stimulation, not the procedure itself. Mild stimulation protocols offer a better risk-benefit balance for donors

Keywords:
commercializationethicsmild stimulationoocyte donationproportionality principle

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Impact of Immediate Partial Removal of Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes on Fertilization Efficiency and Embryo Quality
08:06

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Impact of Immediate Partial Removal of Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes on Fertilization Efficiency and Embryo Quality

Published on: October 18, 2024

667
Fertility Preservation in Patients with Severe Ovarian Dysfunction
12:03

Fertility Preservation in Patients with Severe Ovarian Dysfunction

Published on: March 25, 2021

4.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Fertility Preservation Through Oocyte Vitrification: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives
08:46

Fertility Preservation Through Oocyte Vitrification: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives

Published on: September 16, 2021

6.4K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Impact of Immediate Partial Removal of Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes on Fertilization Efficiency and Embryo Quality
08:06

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Impact of Immediate Partial Removal of Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes on Fertilization Efficiency and Embryo Quality

Published on: October 18, 2024

667
Fertility Preservation in Patients with Severe Ovarian Dysfunction
12:03

Fertility Preservation in Patients with Severe Ovarian Dysfunction

Published on: March 25, 2021

4.8K

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive medicine
  • Bioethics
  • Women's health

Background:

  • Oocyte donation is increasingly commercialized, raising ethical concerns.
  • Donor interests are often overlooked despite significant health risks.
  • High hormonal stimulation is identified as the primary source of harm.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the risk-benefit balance of different hormonal stimulation protocols in oocyte donation.
  • To advocate for donor well-being in the context of increasing commercialization.
  • To question the necessity of high-stimulation protocols.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of health risks associated with high versus mild hormonal stimulation.
  • Review of ethical considerations in oocyte donation practices.
  • Assessment of the risk-benefit ratio for donors undergoing oocyte retrieval.

Main Results:

  • High hormonal stimulation significantly increases health risks for oocyte donors.
  • Mild stimulation protocols present a more favorable risk-benefit profile.
  • The current practice of high stimulation is not adequately justified by the benefits.

Conclusions:

  • Reducing reliance on high hormonal stimulation is crucial for donor safety.
  • Ethical frameworks must prioritize donor health and well-being.
  • Mild stimulation protocols should be preferred in oocyte donation.