Comparison of the precision of seven analytical methods for the H2O concentration in human serum and urine

In order to calculate a true renal H2O clearance (U X V/P), serum and urine H2O concentrations have to be known. In this investigation we compared the precision (repeatability) and the ease of performance of 7 H2O assays in human serum and urine. The 3 gravimetric assays (oven-drying, freeze-drying or freeze-drying as well as oven-drying) had a very high precision (coefficients of variation (CV) 0.2-0.4%) and were easy to perform. The precision of mass spectrometry, gas chromatography and titrimetry (Karl Fischer) was better in urine than in serum (ranges of CV 1.2-1.5% in urine vs. 2.4-4.3% in serum), but the precision of osmometry was better in serum than in urine (CV 1.0 vs. 1.6%). Accuracy was not determined as storage effects at 4 degrees C and at -20 degrees C caused insuperable logistic problems. Only small sample volumes are used in titrimetry and gas chromatography, making them more suitable for determinations in babies and animal studies. With titrimetry determinations can be done in a short time. The gravimetric assays appear to reflect the true H2O content of serum and urine, thus enabling calculation of the true renal H2O clearance, which can be of clinical importance in liver, renal and cardiac disease.