Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery
Published on: September 22, 2023
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Causes and patient outcomes
Majid A Almadi1, Abdulelah Almutairdi2, Ibrahim M Alruzug3
1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a significant health issue. This study found predominantly nonvariceal causes, with rebleeding and mortality rates similar to other research.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Internal Medicine
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) presents a substantial healthcare challenge, associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
- Understanding patient characteristics and outcomes is crucial for effective management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To delineate the clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and patient outcomes associated with UGIB.
- To identify key factors influencing patient outcomes in UGIB cases.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of electronic endoscopic reports from January 2006 to January 2015 at a tertiary care university hospital.
- Inclusion criteria encompassed patients undergoing gastroscopy for UGIB, with data collection on demographics, comorbidities, medications, symptoms, hemodynamic status, and laboratory results.
- Outcomes assessed included the need for blood products, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, rebleeding, and in-hospital mortality.
Main Results:
- The study included 259 patients (66.8% male, mean age 57.1 years), with 88.2% having at least one comorbidity.
- Nonvariceal sources accounted for 80.1% of UGIB causes. ICU admission was required for 15.5%, rebleeding occurred in 8.9%, and in-hospital mortality was 4.4%.
- No significant association was found between pre-endoscopic or total Rockall scores and rebleeding or ICU admission.
Conclusions:
- The predominant causes of UGIB in this cohort were nonvariceal.
- Rebleeding and mortality rates were comparable to those reported in international studies.
- The Rockall scoring system did not demonstrate predictive value for rebleeding or ICU admission in this population.
More Related Videos
07:44Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Published on: March 25, 2022
04:00Laparoscopic Splenectomy with Pericardial Devascularization for Hypersplenism and Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage Due to Portal Hypertension
Published on: November 15, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction
An acute ulcer, marked by superficial erosion and minimal inflammation, swiftly resolves upon identifying and addressing the underlying cause. In contrast, a chronic ulcer persists, potentially eroding through the muscular wall and forming fibrous tissue.
Peptic ulcers can also be...
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical manifestations of acute gastritis
The patient with acute gastritis may have a rapid onset of symptoms, such as epigastric pain or discomfort, dyspepsia, anorexia, hiccups, or nausea and vomiting, which can last from a few hours to a few days. Erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis may cause bleeding, which may manifest as blood in vomit or as...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.