Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
Published on: July 18, 2020
Performance of the Lea symbols chart for screening Nigerian children aged 3 to 5 years
T S Obajolowo1, F O Olatunji2, D S Ademola-Popoola2
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Insights
The Lea symbols chart is a useful vision screening tool for 5-year-olds in Nigeria. Further research is needed to optimize its use for 3-4 year olds to improve accuracy and reduce unnecessary eye exams.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Pediatric Optometry
- Public Health
Background:
- Early detection of amblyopia in preschool children (3-5 years) is crucial.
- Vision screening tools must be highly testable, sensitive, and specific for this age group.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the Lea symbols chart's effectiveness for vision screening in Nigerian primary school children aged 3-5 years.
- To determine testability, sensitivity, and specificity of the Lea symbols chart in this population.
Main Methods:
- 464 children from 12 primary schools in Kwara State, Nigeria, were screened using the Lea symbols chart by trained personnel.
- Children not meeting referral criteria or untestable underwent comprehensive eye examinations.
- Data on testability, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were analyzed by age and gender.
Main Results:
- Testability was high (99.1% for 5-year-olds) but decreased with younger age (85.7% for 3-year-olds).
- Visual acuity improved with age, with no significant gender difference.
- Overall specificity was 77.4%, improving to 92.5% with adjusted visual acuity thresholds (6/12 for 5-year-olds, 6/15 for 3-4 year-olds).
Conclusions:
- The Lea symbols chart is effective for vision screening in Nigerian preschool children, particularly 5-year-olds.
- Lower specificity in 3-4 year-olds suggests a need to refine visual acuity thresholds to minimize false positives and unnecessary referrals.
Background:
Vision screening in children of preschool age (age 3-5 years) gives the opportunity for timely detection of amblyopia. The tools that would be used for screening must have high rates of testability in these young children, and must have high enough sensitivity and specificity to be reliable and cost effective.
Aims:
To assess the performance of the Lea symbols chart as a screening tool in children aged 3 to 5 years attending primary schools in Kwara State, Nigeria.
Methods:
Visual acuity (VA) of 464 children selected from 12 schools by a multistage sampling procedure was checked using the Lea symbols chart by trained Lea screeners. Children meeting the referral criteria and untestable children had a comprehensive eye examination. Testability rates, sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were analyzed based on age and gender, with corresponding significance values generated.
Results:
Testability rates among 5 year olds were as high as 99.1%, decreasing significantly to 95.5% in 4 year olds and 85.7% in 3 year olds (p value < 0.001). Visual acuity performance improved with age (p value 0.002) but was unrelated to gender. The Lea symbols chart had an overall specificity of 77.4% (63.2% among 3 year olds and 83.5% among 5 year olds). At VA thresholds of 6/12 for 5 year olds and 6/15 for 3-4 year olds, the screening tool became 87.7% specific among 3 year olds and 94.3% specific among 5 year olds (overall 92.5%).
Conclusion:
The Lea symbols chart was found to be a useful screening tool in this environment, especially among 5 year olds. The reduced specificity among 3-4 year olds may prompt further research into the appropriate VA thresholds for 3-4 year olds to reduce the burden of unnecessary comprehensive eye evaluations resulting from too many false positive results.
More Related Videos
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017