Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Statutes Governing Default Surrogate Decision Making for Mental Health Treatment
Cavan K Doyle1, Erin S DeMartino1, Beau P Sperry1
1Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois (Doyle); Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (DeMartino); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Sperry); School of Law, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago (Unno); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California (Roberts); Department of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dudzinski); Departments of Medicine and Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. (Sulmasy); Department of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin (Mueller); Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Kramer); MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago (Siegler).
Objective:
The authors sought to describe state-to-state variations in the scope of statutory authority granted to default surrogates who decide on mental health treatment for incapacitated patients.
Methods:
The authors investigated state statutes delineating the powers of default surrogates to make decisions about mental health treatment. Statutes in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia were identified and analyzed independently by three reviewers. Research was conducted from August 2017 to November 2018 and updated in January 2020.
Results:
State statutes varied in approaches to default surrogate decision making for mental health treatment. Eight states' statutes delegate broad authority to surrogates, whereas 25 states prohibit surrogates from giving consent for specific therapies. Thirteen states are silent on whether surrogates may make decisions.
Conclusions:
Heterogeneity among state statutory laws contributes to complexity of treating patients without decisional capacity. This variability encumbers efforts to support surrogates and clinicians and may contribute to health disparities.
Related Concept Videos
01:19Standards of Care II
01:22Standards of Care I
01:30Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
01:30Ethical Dilemmas II
01:24Treatment Strategies for Psychological Disorders
Psychological therapies focus on modifying emotions, thoughts, and behaviors through talking, interpreting, listening, rewarding, challenging, and modeling. Clinical psychologists, counselors, and social workers commonly practice psychotherapy. Clinical...
01:27Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare: