Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Research — Tailored Langendorff Perfusion Techniques for Improved Experimental Outcomes
Published on: June 14, 2024
Effect of different perfusion flow on carotid artery blood flow during cardiopulmonary bypass
Yujiao Guan1, Bei Sun2, Zongbin Song2
1Department of Anesthesiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China. guanyujiao8819@163.com.
Insights
Different cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) perfusion flows impact carotid artery hemodynamics, with higher flows correlating to better blood flow and velocity. Carotid ultrasound effectively assesses cardiac output during CPB procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Medical Imaging
- Hemodynamics
Background:
- Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a critical procedure in cardiac surgery.
- Optimizing CPB perfusion flow is essential for maintaining adequate organ perfusion.
- Carotid artery hemodynamics can serve as an indicator of systemic blood flow during CPB.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of varying CPB perfusion flow rates on carotid artery blood flow dynamics.
- To assess the correlation between CPB perfusion flow and carotid artery hemodynamics.
- To determine the utility of carotid artery ultrasound in evaluating cardiac output during CPB.
Main Methods:
- Forty-five adult patients undergoing heart valve replacement or ventricular septal defect repair were randomized into three groups with different CPB perfusion flows (62±2, 72±2, 82±2 mL/(kg·min)).
- Carotid artery ultrasound (common and internal) was used to measure diameter, peak velocity, and flow at multiple time points.
- Hemoglobin and lactic acid levels were monitored, alongside CPB parameters and postoperative outcomes.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in hemoglobin or lactic acid levels were observed between groups.
- Common carotid artery velocity and flow decreased during CPB but recovered post-procedure.
- Internal carotid artery velocity and flow showed significant differences between groups, with higher perfusion flows generally associated with better hemodynamics.
- Perfusion flow positively correlated with common carotid artery flow and internal carotid artery velocity and flow at 20 minutes into CPB (T4).
- No neurological complications or significant differences in postoperative recovery were noted.
Conclusions:
- Varying CPB perfusion flows exert distinct effects on carotid artery hemodynamics.
- A correlation exists between carotid artery hemodynamics and CPB perfusion flow.
- Carotid ultrasound is a valuable tool for evaluating cardiac output during CPB.
Objectives:
To investigate the effect of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with different perfusion flow on carotid artery blood by using the carotid artery ultrasound.
Methods:
Forty-five adult patients during Dec. 2014 to Jan. 2015 scheduled for heart valve replacement or ventricular septal defect repair were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=15) according to different perfusion flow during CPB: A Group 1 [(62±2) mL/(kg·min)], a Group 2 [(72±2) mL/(kg·min)], and a Group 3 [(82±2) mL/(kg·min)]. The diameter of the common carotid artery (CCAD), the peak velocity of the common carotid artery (CCAV),the flow of the common carotid artery (CCAF), the diameter of the internal carotid artery (ICAD), the peak velocity of the internal carotid artery (ICAV) and the flow of the internal carotid artery (ICAF) were measured at the responding time points before the anesthesia induction (T1), after the anesthesia induction (T2), 10 min into CPB (T3), 20 min into CPB (T4), 40 min into CPB (T5), 60 min into CPB(T6), 20 min after CPB ending (T7) by doppler ultrasonography, respectively. The hemoglobin (Hb) and lactic acid were compared at the time before CPB(P1),the time when temperature was decreased to the lowest during CPB (P2), the time when temperature was reheated to 35 ℃ (P3), 20 min after CPB was ended (P4), 2 hours after CPB was ended (P5) by α-steady method. The parameters of CPB and hemodynamic parameters at each time point and postoperative condition were recorded.
Results:
There was no significant difference in Hb and lactic acid between the three groups (all P>0.05). For intra-group comparison, the Hb concentration at P2-P5 was lower than that at P1 (all P<0.05), and the Hb concentration was the lowest at P2 and P3. The level of lactic acid at P3-P5 was higher than those at P1 (all P<0.05).There were no significant differences in measurement of carotid artery between the left and right sides of the patients at T1 (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in CCAV and CCAF among the 3 groups (both P>0.05). For intra-group comparison, the CCAV at T2-T6 was significantly lower than that at T1 (P<0.05), and higher at T7 than that at T2-T6 (all P<0.05), but it was still significantly lower than that at T1 (P<0.05). The difference of CCAF between T2-T5 and T1 was significant (all P<0.05). ICAV of G1 was lower than G3 at T3 (P<0.05). ICAV of G1 was lower than G2, and G2 was lower that G3 at T4 (both P<0.05). ICAV of G1 was lower than G2 at T6 (P<0.05). For intra-group comparison, the ICAV at T2 was significantly lower than that at T1 (P<0.05), and that at T3-T6 was significantly lower than that at T1 and T2 (all P<0.05). At T3-T6, ICAF of G1 was lower than that of G3 (all P<0.05). For intra-group comparison, ICAF at T2-T6 was significantly lower than that at T1 (all P<0.05). At T4, perfusion flow was positively correlated with CCAF, ICAV and ICAV (all P<0.05). None of the patients had obvious motor, sensory, or consciousness disturbance, and no neurological complications.There was no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay, postoperative ICU time, and postoperative extubation time among the 3 groups (all P>0.05).
Conclusions:
Different perfusion flows of CPB have different effects on carotids hemodynamics.There is correlation between carotids hemodynamics and perfusion flow. Carotid ultrasound examination can be used to evaluate cardiac output.
More Related Videos
08:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
Published on: August 2, 2024
09:24O-Ring Aortic Banding Versus Traditional Transverse Aortic Constriction for Modeling Pressure Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
Published on: October 6, 2022