Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What makes a good medical photographer?

Journal of visual communication in medicine·2025
Same author

A cross-over, randomised feasibility study of digitally-printed versus hand-painted artificial eyes in adults (PERSONAL-EYE-S): health economic findings.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2025
Same author

Titanium-Zirconia abutment-implant assemblies: Are they alternatives for single material implants?

Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials·2025
Same author

Aligning consent and governance with the realities of mobile device clinical photography.

Journal of visual communication in medicine·2025
Same author

Improving facial prosthesis construction with a contactless scanning and digital workflow: A feasibility crossover randomized controlled trial of digital versus conventional manufacture of orbital and nasal prostheses.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2025
Same author

How I do It: Endoscopic transorbital resection of sphenoid osseous meningioma via the lateral orbital 'sliding coach door' approach.

Acta neurochirurgica·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.7K

Novel artificial eye service evaluation using patient reported outcome measures.

Taras Gout1, Emma Grace Walshaw2, Timothy Zoltie3

  • 1Ophthalmology Trainee, Department of Ophthalmology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK. tarasgout@gmail.com.

Eye (London, England)
|October 14, 2020
PubMed
Summary

High-definition ocular prostheses (artificial eyes) show promising patient-reported outcomes. Service evaluations are crucial for advancing medical technologies like these novel artificial eyes.

More Related Videos

A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision
09:29

A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision

Published on: February 11, 2014

13.4K
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

429

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.7K
A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision
09:29

A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision

Published on: February 11, 2014

13.4K
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

429

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Patient Reported Outcomes

Background:

  • Service evaluation of high-definition ocular prostheses (artificial eyes).
  • Focus on patient-reported outcomes for enhanced prosthetic devices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate patient experiences with new high-definition ocular prostheses.
  • To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of patient questionnaires.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized validated questionnaires (FACE-Q, DAS24, HADS) with 10 patients.
  • Conducted descriptive analysis and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for statistical analysis.
  • Achieved an 80% questionnaire response rate.

Main Results:

  • PCA reduced the number of variables, identifying two principal components (PC1, PC2).
  • Both components demonstrated very good to excellent internal consistency (factor loading α = 0.7-0.9).
  • Results indicate good reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the evaluated prostheses.

Conclusions:

  • Highlights the importance of service evaluations for rapidly advancing medical technologies.
  • Suggests further clinical studies are needed to confirm positive results of novel artificial eyes.
  • Emphasizes the potential of high-definition ocular prostheses compared to traditional methods.