Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Limits to Natural Selection

Limits to Natural Selection

Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.

The Evidence for Evolution

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Morphological specializations of mosquito CO<sub>2</sub>-sensing olfactory receptor neurons.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Same author

Simultaneous recording of spikes and calcium signals in odor-evoked responses of <i>Drosophila</i> antennal neurons.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

A GATA factor radiation in <i>Caenorhabditis</i> rewired the endoderm specification network.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

Hybrid incompatibility emerges at the one-cell stage in interspecies <i>Caenorhabditis</i> embryos.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024

Same author

Networks of Causal Linkage Between Eigenmodes Characterize Behavioral Dynamics of Caenorhabditis elegans.

PLoS computational biology·2021

Same author

Tracking changes in behavioural dynamics using prediction error.

PloS one·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

A larger target leads to faster evolution.

Bing Yang¹, Scott A Rifkin¹

¹Section of Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States.

|October 14, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Cell fate evolution in nematode worms is driven by the number of genes involved, not by high mutation rates. This finding impacts our understanding of developmental genetics and evolutionary processes.

Keywords:

Caenorhabditis evolutionary biology evolutionary rate genetics genomics mutational target mutational variance vulva

More Related Videos

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Published on: September 20, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Published on: September 20, 2016

Area of Science:

Developmental biology
Evolutionary genetics
Nematode biology

Background:

Cell fate decisions are fundamental to development.
Understanding the evolutionary drivers of these decisions is crucial.
Nematode worms provide a model system for studying developmental processes.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the factors influencing the evolutionary speed of cell fate decisions in nematode worms.
To determine whether gene number or mutation rate is the primary driver of evolutionary change in cell fate pathways.

Main Methods:

Comparative genomic analysis of cell fate genes across different nematode species.
Computational modeling to assess the impact of gene duplication and mutation on evolutionary trajectories.
Experimental evolution studies in model nematode systems.

Main Results:

The number of genes regulating a specific cell fate decision correlates with the rate of its evolution.
High mutation rates were not found to be the primary factor accelerating the evolution of cell fate decisions.
Genetic architecture, specifically the number of genes involved, is a key determinant of evolutionary plasticity.

Conclusions:

The evolutionary rate of cell fate decisions is primarily shaped by the complexity of the genetic network controlling them.
This highlights the importance of gene repertoire and regulatory network evolution in adaptation and diversification.
Findings suggest that changes in gene number, rather than increased mutation rates, facilitate rapid evolutionary adaptation of developmental processes.