Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Automated Contraction Analysis of Human Engineered Heart Tissue for Cardiac Drug Safety Screening
Published on: April 15, 2017
Comparison of 10 Control hPSC Lines for Drug Screening in an Engineered Heart Tissue Format
Ingra Mannhardt1, Umber Saleem1, Diogo Mosqueira2
1Department of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Insights
Control human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM) show wide functional variations. While baseline differences are significant for disease modeling, drug screening suitability is less impacted but requires multiple cell lines.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Research
- Stem Cell Biology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM) are crucial for cardiac research and drug screening.
- Routine cardiac differentiation protocols are established, leading to commercial availability of hiPSC-CM.
- A systematic evaluation of control hiPSC-CM lines for functional consistency and drug screening suitability is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the functional characteristics of 10 different control hiPSC-CM lines.
- To assess the suitability of these hiPSC-CM lines for drug screening applications.
- To investigate the impact of inter-line variability on contractile function and drug responses.
Main Methods:
- Ten control hiPSC-CM lines (5 commercial, 5 academic) were differentiated and cast into engineered heart tissue (EHT).
- Spontaneous and stimulated EHT contractions were analyzed for contractile force and kinetics.
- Seven inotropic indicator compounds were tested on 8 hiPSC-CM lines to evaluate drug response accuracy.
Main Results:
- Significant variability was observed in baseline contractile force, kinetics, and rate among different hiPSC-CM lines (e.g., relaxation time: 118-471 ms).
- Qualitative accuracy of responses to inotropic compounds (e.g., BayK-8644, isoprenaline) ranged from 80% to 93% across cell lines.
- Despite wide baseline differences, the qualitative drug response patterns showed less variability.
Conclusions:
- Large baseline functional differences among control hiPSC-CM lines highlight the need for isogenic controls in disease modeling.
- Variability in hiPSC-CM lines is less critical for drug screening but necessitates using multiple cell lines per study.
- Standardized evaluation and careful selection of hiPSC-CM lines are important for reliable research outcomes.
Abstract:
Human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM) are commercially available, and cardiac differentiation established routine. Systematic evaluation of several control hiPSC-CM is lacking. We investigated 10 different control hiPSC-CM lines and analyzed function and suitability for drug screening. Five commercial and 5 academic hPSC-CM lines were casted in engineered heart tissue (EHT) format. Spontaneous and stimulated EHT contractions were analyzed, and 7 inotropic indicator compounds investigated on 8 cell lines. Baseline contractile force, kinetics, and rate varied widely among the different lines (e.g., relaxation time range: 118-471 ms). In contrast, the qualitative correctness of responses to BayK-8644, nifedipine, EMD-57033, isoprenaline, and digoxin in terms of force and kinetics varied only between 80% and 93%. Large baseline differences between control cell lines support the request for isogenic controls in disease modeling. Variability appears less relevant for drug screening but needs to be considered, arguing for studies with more than one line.
More Related Videos
14:03High-Throughput Cardiotoxicity Screening Using Mature Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocyte Monolayers
Published on: March 24, 2023
11:38High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
Published on: May 10, 2016