Comparison of 10 Control hPSC Lines for Drug Screening in an Engineered Heart Tissue Format

Ingra Mannhardt1, Umber Saleem1, Diogo Mosqueira2

  • 1Department of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

Stem Cell Reports
|October 14, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Control human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM) show wide functional variations. While baseline differences are significant for disease modeling, drug screening suitability is less impacted but requires multiple cell lines.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Stem Cell Biology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM) are crucial for cardiac research and drug screening.
  • Routine cardiac differentiation protocols are established, leading to commercial availability of hiPSC-CM.
  • A systematic evaluation of control hiPSC-CM lines for functional consistency and drug screening suitability is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the functional characteristics of 10 different control hiPSC-CM lines.
  • To assess the suitability of these hiPSC-CM lines for drug screening applications.
  • To investigate the impact of inter-line variability on contractile function and drug responses.

Main Methods:

  • Ten control hiPSC-CM lines (5 commercial, 5 academic) were differentiated and cast into engineered heart tissue (EHT).
  • Spontaneous and stimulated EHT contractions were analyzed for contractile force and kinetics.
  • Seven inotropic indicator compounds were tested on 8 hiPSC-CM lines to evaluate drug response accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Significant variability was observed in baseline contractile force, kinetics, and rate among different hiPSC-CM lines (e.g., relaxation time: 118-471 ms).
  • Qualitative accuracy of responses to inotropic compounds (e.g., BayK-8644, isoprenaline) ranged from 80% to 93% across cell lines.
  • Despite wide baseline differences, the qualitative drug response patterns showed less variability.

Conclusions:

  • Large baseline functional differences among control hiPSC-CM lines highlight the need for isogenic controls in disease modeling.
  • Variability in hiPSC-CM lines is less critical for drug screening but necessitates using multiple cell lines per study.
  • Standardized evaluation and careful selection of hiPSC-CM lines are important for reliable research outcomes.

Related Concept Videos