Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Investigations on the GaIII Complex of EOB-DTPA and Its 68Ga Radiolabeled Analogue
Published on: August 17, 2016
Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI: Assessment of arterial phase artifacts and hepatobiliary uptake in a large series
Naik Vietti Violi1, Pamela Argiriadi2, Ally Rosen2
1BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Purpose:
To report the quality of gadoxetate disodium MRI in a large series by assessing the prevalence of: 1) arterial phase (AP) artifacts and its predictive factors, 2) decreased hepatic contrast uptake during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP).
Methods:
This retrospective single center study included 851 patients (M/F:537/314, mean age: 63y) with gadoxetate disodium MRI. The MRI protocol included unenhanced, dual arterial [early and late arterial phases (AP)], portal venous, transitional and hepatobiliary phases. Three radiologists graded dynamic images using a 5-scale score (1: no motion, 5: severe, nondiagnostic) for assessment of transient severe motion (TSM, defined as a score ≥4 during at least one AP with a score ≤3 during other phases). HBP uptake was assessed using a 3-scale score (based on portal vein/hepatic signal). The association between demographic, clinical and acquisition parameters with TSM was tested in uni- and multivariate logistic regression.
Results:
TSM was observed in 103/851 patients (12.1 %): 83 (9.8 %) in one AP and 20 (2.3 %) in both APs. A score of 5 (nondiagnostic) was assigned in 7 patients in one AP (0.8 %) and none in both. Presence of TSM was significantly associated with age (p = 0.002) and liver disease (p = 0.033) in univariate but not in multivariate analysis (p > 0.05). No association was found between acquisition parameters and TSM occurrence. Limited or severely limited HBP contrast uptake was observed in 87 patients (10.2 %), and TSM was never associated with severely limited HBP contrast uptake.
Conclusion:
TSM was present in approximately 12 % of gadoxetate disodium MRIs, rarely on both APs (2.3 %), and was poorly predicted. TSM was never associated with severely limited HBP contrast uptake.
Insights
Transient severe motion (TSM) affected 12% of gadoxetate disodium MRIs, rarely impacting both arterial phases. This motion artifact was not linked to reduced hepatobiliary phase contrast uptake.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Hepatobiliary Imaging
Background:
- Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI is crucial for liver lesion characterization.
- Assessing image quality, particularly arterial phase (AP) motion and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) uptake, is vital for diagnostic accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of arterial phase artifacts (transient severe motion - TSM) in gadoxetate disodium MRI.
- To identify predictive factors for TSM.
- To evaluate the incidence of decreased hepatic contrast uptake in the HBP.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 851 gadoxetate disodium MRI scans.
- Inclusion of dual arterial (AP), portal venous, transitional, and hepatobiliary phases.
- Radiologist grading of AP motion (TSM) and HBP contrast uptake.
Main Results:
- TSM occurred in 12.1% of scans, predominantly in a single AP (9.8%).
- TSM was associated with age and liver disease in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis.
- Limited HBP contrast uptake was seen in 10.2% of patients; TSM did not correlate with severely limited HBP uptake.
Conclusions:
- Approximately 12% of gadoxetate disodium MRIs exhibit TSM, with rare occurrence in both APs.
- Predictive factors for TSM were not robustly identified.
- TSM does not appear to compromise HBP contrast uptake significantly.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

