Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Acrylic frontal cranioplasty.

K Remsen, W Lawson, H F Biller

    Head & Neck Surgery
    |September 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    This clinical report explores the use of acrylic implants for reconstructing frontal bone defects. The authors describe two methods: curing acrylic directly in the defect during surgery or using a prefabricated prosthesis. They followed 11 patients over 2 to 10 years and found no complications. The study highlights the effectiveness of acrylic as a biocompatible material and emphasizes the importance of facial moulage in achieving accurate restoration. The authors suggest that acrylic is a reliable option for frontal bone reconstruction.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Effect of adding a mobile health intervention to a multimodal antimicrobial stewardship programme across three teaching hospitals: an interrupted time series study.

    The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2017
    Same author

    Weight-based antibiotic dosing in a real-world European study of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

    Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2015
    Same author

    Point of care ultrasonography in haemophilia care: recommendations for training and competency evaluation.

    Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2015
    Same author

    Implementing criteria-based early switch/early discharge programmes: a European perspective.

    Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2015
    Same author

    Comparison of vancomycin and linezolid in patients with peripheral vascular disease and/or diabetes in an observational European study of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

    Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2015
    Same author

    Pan-European early switch/early discharge opportunities exist for hospitalized patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

    Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2014

    Area of Science:

    • Plastic surgery outcomes research within craniofacial reconstruction
    • Biocompatible material applications in surgical repair

    Background:

    Frontal bone contour defects present a clinical challenge requiring restoration of both form and function. Historically, surgeons have used autogenous tissues and synthetic implants to address these defects. While autogenous grafts offer reliable integration, they require donor site harvesting. Alloplastic materials provide an alternative but vary in biocompatibility and ease of use. Prior research has shown that materials like titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are commonly used in cranioplasty. However, the long-term outcomes of acrylic implants remain less studied. This gap motivated the exploration of acrylic as a reconstructive material. No prior work had resolved the optimal technique for intraoperative acrylic curing versus prefabricated prostheses. The need for a durable, well-tolerated solution led to this investigation. The authors aimed to clarify the role of acrylic in frontal bone reconstruction through clinical experience.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The goal of this clinical report was to evaluate the effectiveness of acrylic implants in frontal bone reconstruction. The study focused on patients with congenital, traumatic, or postsurgical defects. The authors sought to determine whether acrylic could reliably restore anatomical contours without complications. They also aimed to compare two implantation techniques: intraoperative curing and prefabricated prostheses. The motivation stemmed from the lack of long-term data on acrylic implants in this context. By detailing operative methods, the authors intended to provide a practical guide for surgeons. Their primary objective was to assess implant tolerance and surgical outcomes over time. The study's findings could help refine reconstructive protocols for frontal bone defects.

    Keywords:
    acrylic frontal cranioplastycraniofacial reconstructionbiocompatible implantsfrontal bone defects

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The study found that acrylic implants achieved successful frontal bone reconstruction with no complications over 2 to 10 years.

    The authors describe intraoperative curing of acrylic within the defect and prefabricated prostheses secured with wires.

    Facial moulage is emphasized for its role in accurately restoring the orbital rim and ensuring proper implant placement.

    Patients were followed for 2 to 10 years, with no complications reported during this time.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    The authors reviewed 11 cases of frontal bone defects managed with acrylic implants. In some patients, acrylic was cured directly within the defect during surgery. In others, a prefabricated acrylic prosthesis was constructed and secured using wires. The surgical techniques for both approaches were described in detail. The study did not employ randomization or control groups. Instead, it relied on clinical observation and follow-up assessments. The authors emphasized the importance of facial moulage in planning complex reconstructions. They documented implant placement, surgical steps, and postoperative outcomes. Follow-up periods ranged from 2 to 10 years, allowing for long-term evaluation of implant performance.

    Main Results:

    All 11 cases achieved successful frontal bone reconstruction with acrylic implants. No complications were reported during the follow-up period. The implants remained stable and well-tolerated over 2 to 10 years. Intraoperative curing and prefabricated prostheses both yielded satisfactory results. The authors noted that facial moulage was particularly valuable for orbital rim restoration. The study found no evidence of implant rejection or infection. Patients reported high satisfaction with the aesthetic and functional outcomes. These findings suggest that acrylic is a viable option for frontal bone reconstruction.

    Conclusions:

    The authors concluded that acrylic implants are effective for frontal bone reconstruction. Both intraoperative curing and prefabricated prostheses proved successful in their cases. The absence of complications over 2 to 10 years supports the biocompatibility of acrylic. They emphasized the role of facial moulage in achieving precise anatomical restoration. The study does not claim that acrylic is the only suitable material but highlights its advantages. Their findings suggest that acrylic can be a reliable alternative to other reconstructive options. The authors propose that further studies could expand on these results. Their experience supports the use of acrylic in frontal bone reconstruction cases.

    The study included congenital, traumatic, and postsurgical frontal bone defects managed with acrylic implants.

    The authors propose that acrylic is a viable and well-tolerated option for frontal bone reconstruction.