Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation01:30

Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

182
Heart failure can be classified in various ways, with the most common classifications based on physical activity limitations, disease progression, severity, and treatment strategies.The Functional Classification of Heart Failure divides patients into four categories based on physical activity limitation due to symptom burden.Class I: Patients in this class have cardiac disease but no physical activity limitations. Ordinary activities like walking, climbing stairs, or routine tasks do not cause...
182
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

286
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
286
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

1.5K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
1.5K
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure01:17

Pathophysiology of Heart Failure

2.4K
Heart failure (HF) is a progressive syndrome involving ventricles that leads to inadequate cardiac output. It can be classified based on location and output or ejection fraction. Ejection fraction (EF) is an essential measurement in the diagnosis and surveillance of HF. Reduced EF corresponds to systolic heart failure (HFrEF). However, HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is becoming increasingly prevalent. Also known as diastolic HF, this form of HF is related to aging. The...
2.4K
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology01:29

Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology

483
Systolic Heart Failure and Compensatory MechanismsSystolic heart failure (also termed HFrEF, Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction) is the most prevalent type of heart filure. It results in a decreased volume of blood being pumped from the ventricle. The aortic arch and carotid sinuses have baroreceptors that detect reduced blood pressure, triggering the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) to release epinephrine and norepinephrine. Initially, this response aims to boost heart rate and...
483
Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

311
The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
311

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reporting changes in right ventricular systolic pressure: insights from Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis.

Echo research and practice·2026
Same author

Timeliness of Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis Diagnosis in the Medicare Population.

JAMA cardiology·2026
Same author

Predictors of Discharge Diuretic Prescription Duration and Medication Adherence in Heart Failure.

Journal of cardiac failure·2026
Same author

Association Between Lipoprotein(a) Testing, Lipid-Lowering Therapy Intensification, and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goal Attainment: Findings From the Veterans Affairs Health System.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

Changes in Clinician Telemedicine Use and Care Patterns for Patients With Heart Failure in the United States.

Circulation. Population health and outcomes·2026
Same author

Advancing quality in post-acute cardiovascular and stroke care: Why national leadership and certification matter.

The American journal of medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:16

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

437

Can We Do More With Less While Building Predictive Models? A Study in Parsimony of Risk Models for Predicting Heart

Satish M Mahajan1, Amey Mahajan, Prabir Burman

  • 1Author Affiliations: VA Palo Alto Health Care System, CA (Drs Mahajan and Heidenreich); Yale University, New Haven, CT (Mr A. Mahajan); University of California, Davis (Dr Burman); Stanford University, CA (Dr Heidenreich).

Computers, Informatics, Nursing : CIN
|October 15, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Reducing predictors in heart failure readmission models improves efficiency without sacrificing accuracy. This helps hospitals better predict patient risk and implement timely post-discharge care.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:16

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

437
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Health Informatics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Hospital readmissions for heart failure (HF) represent a significant financial and clinical burden.
  • Accurate prediction of 30-day HF readmission risk is crucial for effective post-discharge interventions.
  • Increasing data complexity necessitates efficient risk prediction models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore and demonstrate predictor reduction methods for HF readmission risk models.
  • To assess the impact of reducing predictors on predictive performance and model-building time.
  • To identify optimal models balancing accuracy and efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Applied three predictor reduction techniques to a real-world dataset of 1210 patients with 57 variables.
  • Compared models derived from reduced predictors against a full 57-predictor model.
  • Evaluated predictive performance using the C-statistic and measured model-building time.

Main Results:

  • Predictive performance (C-statistic) ranged from 0.630 to 0.840.
  • Model-building time varied significantly, from 10 minutes to 10 hours.
  • A final model with 16 predictors achieved a C-statistic of 0.832, comparable to the full model (0.840), with a 66-fold improvement in building time.

Conclusions:

  • Predictor reduction methods can significantly decrease model-building time for heart failure readmission risk.
  • Efficient models with fewer predictors maintain high predictive accuracy.
  • Optimized models facilitate timely and effective post-discharge care planning.