Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Continued versus interrupted direct oral anticoagulation for cardiac electronic device implantation: A systematic
Pablo A Mendoza1, Sukrit Narula1,2, William F McIntyre1,3,2
1Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Continuing direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) during cardiac device implantation showed no significant difference in bleeding or clotting risks compared to interruption. Interruption is generally preferred for convenience, but continuation is an option if uninterrupted anticoagulation is needed.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Many patients require cardiac device implantation while on direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC).
- Balancing bleeding risk from continuing DOAC versus thromboembolic risk from interrupting DOAC is crucial.
- Current guidelines offer limited clarity on optimal DOAC management during these procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of clinically significant pocket hematoma and thromboembolism.
- To evaluate outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac device implantation with continued versus interrupted DOAC therapy.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases up to December 2019.
- Inclusion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.
- Meta-analysis of RCT data and quality assessment using GRADE criteria.
Main Results:
- Two RCTs (763 patients) and three observational studies were included.
- No significant difference in pocket hematoma (2.1% vs 1.8%) or thromboembolism (0.03% vs 0.03%) between continued and interrupted DOAC groups in RCTs.
- Moderate quality of evidence due to imprecision; observational studies corroborated findings.
Conclusions:
- Continuing DOACs during cardiac device implantation results in minimal difference in pocket hematoma or thromboembolic events.
- Interrupting DOACs is often the preferred strategy due to ease of management.
- DOAC continuation may be considered when uninterrupted anticoagulation is essential, avoiding parenteral bridging.
Background:
Many patients undergoing cardiac device implantation are taking direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC). Continuing DOAC during device implantation may increase periprocedural bleeding risk; however, interrupting DOACs may increase thromboembolic risk.
Objective:
To compare the incidence of clinically significant pocket hematoma and thromboembolism in patients who have their DOAC continued or interrupted for cardiac device implantation.
Methods:
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and randomized controlled trial (CENTRAL) until December 2019 and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared outcomes after continuing or interrupting DOAC during cardiac device implantation. Independently and in duplicate, reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full text of potentially eligible studies. They then evaluated risk of bias and abstracted data. RCT data were pooled using a fixed-effect model. Quality of evidence was assessed using grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE).
Results:
Two RCTs, representing 763 patients, and three observational studies met eligibility criteria. In RCTs, continuing DOAC for device implantation compared to interrupting DOAC resulted in no significant difference in clinically significant pocket hematoma (2.1% vs 1.8%; RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.44-3.05) or thromboembolism (0.03% vs 0.03%; RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.06-16.21). Quality of evidence for both outcomes was moderate due to imprecision. Observational studies showed similar results.
Conclusions:
Continuing DOACs for device implantation results in little to no difference in the incidence of clinically significant pocket hematoma or thromboembolism. Given the ease of stopping and restarting DOACs, interrupting DOACs may be the preferred strategy for most patients. However, whenever continuous therapeutic anticoagulation is desired, DOAC continuation should be preferred over bridging with parenteral anticoagulation.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management

