Towards identifying malnutrition among infants under 6 months: a mixed-methods study of South-Sudanese refugees in

Laura Moore1, Sinead O'Mahony2, Mark Shevlin3

  • 1Centre for Global Health, University of Dublin, Trinity College, 7-9 South Leinster Street, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland.

Public Health Nutrition
|October 16, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Weight-for-age z-scores (WAZ) best identify malnutrition in infants under 6 months, but mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is more commonly used for admittance to programs. Barriers include misconceptions and protocol issues.

Area of Science:

  • Global Health
  • Pediatric Nutrition
  • Anthropometry

Background:

  • Identifying malnutrition in infants under 6 months (U6M) is critical for timely intervention.
  • Existing anthropometric criteria for malnutrition may not accurately reflect distinct malnourished groups or program admittance probabilities.
  • Barriers to effective malnutrition identification in U6M require investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify distinct malnourished groups among infants under 6 months (U6M) using anthropometric measures.
  • To determine the probability of admittance to the Management of At Risk Mothers and Infants (MAMI) program based on group membership.
  • To compare admission discrepancies between recognized anthropometric criteria and group membership, and identify barriers and solutions for U6M malnutrition identification.

Main Methods:

  • A mixed-methods approach combining factor mixture modeling, chi-squared analysis, and logistic regression.
  • Qualitative analysis of key informant interviews to understand barriers and solutions.
  • Data collected from 3444 South-Sudanese infants under 6 months (U6M) and 11 MAMI programming experts in Ethiopian refugee camps.

Main Results:

  • Distinct well-nourished and malnourished groups of U6M were identified.
  • Weight-for-age z-scores (WAZ) were the most discriminating measure for malnutrition.
  • Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) was most strongly associated with MAMI program admittance, despite WAZ's higher accuracy.
  • Barriers included misconceptions about malnutrition, limited evidence, and issues with current identification protocols.

Conclusions:

  • WAZ is the most discriminating anthropometric measure for identifying malnutrition in U6M.
  • MUAC offers a more scalable, though potentially less accurate, alternative for U6M malnutrition screening.
  • Addressing misconceptions and refining identification protocols are crucial for effective U6M malnutrition management.
Abstract