Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

10:01
Development of Obliterative Bronchiolitis in a Murine Model of Orthotopic Lung Transplantation
Published on: July 10, 2012
20.9K
Hybrid aortic arch repair: 10-year experience from India
Mohammed Idhrees1, Murali Krishnaswami1, Aju Jacob1
1Institute for Cardiac and Advanced Aortic Disorders (ICAAD), SRM Institute of Medical Sciences (SIMS Hospital), Vadapalani, Chennai, 600 026 India.
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
|October 16, 2020
Summary
Hybrid aortic arch replacement (HAAR) offers a safe treatment for aortic arch pathologies. This study found HAAR procedures, particularly Type II, yield good outcomes with improving results as experience grows.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Procedures
Background:
- Hybrid aortic arch replacement (HAAR) is an evolving technique for managing complex aortic arch pathologies.
- HAAR combines open surgical debranching with endovascular stent grafting for a less invasive approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of three distinct types of hybrid aortic arch replacement (HAAR).
- To compare the efficacy and safety of different HAAR techniques in a clinical setting.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 56 patients undergoing HAAR between January 2007 and December 2016.
- Patients were categorized into three groups based on the surgical approach: Group I, II (staged debranching and EVAR without circulatory arrest), and Group III (single-stage antegrade EVAR and arch reconstruction).
- Data collected included patient demographics, pathologies, procedural details, and postoperative complications.
Main Results:
- A total of 56 patients (mean age 59.9 years, 78.57% male) underwent HAAR for aortic dissection (55.36%) or aneurysm (42.86%).
- The 30-day in-hospital mortality was 5.38% (3 patients), with a stroke incidence of 5.38% (3 patients).
- Group I experienced two retrograde aortic dissections and two endoleaks; no patients required hemodialysis.
Conclusions:
- Hybrid aortic arch replacement is a viable treatment option with favorable postoperative results.
- Type II hybrid procedures demonstrated superior outcomes compared to Type I in this cohort.
- Continuous improvement in outcomes is observed with increasing surgical experience.

