Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 15, 2016
Tale of Two sons - Nobelar and Excelar and the blurring edge between them
1Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeon, Institute for Cardiac and Aortic Disorders, SRM Institutes for Medical Science (SIMS Hospitals), Chennai, 600026 India.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are not yet proven superior to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD). An objective heart-team approach is needed for optimal patient care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) poses significant prognostic risk due to the large myocardial territory involved.
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has historically been the gold standard treatment for LMCAD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the current evidence comparing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and CABG for LMCAD.
- To discuss the role and implementation of the heart-team approach in managing LMCAD.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent major clinical trials (e.g., NOBEL, EXCEL) comparing PCI and CABG for LMCAD.
- Discussion on the practical application and effectiveness of the heart-team approach in real-world settings.
Main Results:
- Contradictory results from recent trials suggest PCI is not definitively superior to CABG for LMCAD.
- The extent and manner of heart-team approach implementation in clinical practice remain unclear.
Conclusions:
- The superiority of PCI over CABG for LMCAD remains unproven.
- There is a need for a more objective and standardized heart-team approach in managing LMCAD patients.
Abstract:
Left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) has low incidence but foreshadow a high prognostic risk merely due to the myocardial territory it supplies. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the standard of treatment for LMCAD. Recently, two major trials-NOBEL and EXCEL-with contradicting results have been published. I will not wade into the accusations of malfeasance, but the bottom line is that, superiority of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) to CABG is yet to be proved. Heart-team approach has been discussed in every aspect, but in real-world scenario, to what extent, and in what manner the same is practised, remains a question. We need an objective type of heart-team approach than a subjective heart-team approach.
Related Concept Videos
Crossing Over
Crossing Over
The homologous pairs of sister chromosomes—one from the maternal and one from the paternal genome—then begin to align alongside each other lengthwise, matching corresponding DNA positions in a process...
Equivalent Couples
Two couples are considered to be equivalent if they produce the same rotational effect on a rigid body. In other words, the two couples have the same magnitude and act in the same direction, causing the same angular displacement or acceleration in the body.
For instance, consider two couples lying in the plane of the page, with one having a pair of equal...
Non-nuclear Inheritance
Blinding
Inheritance
Each gene exists in pairs, and the combination of these genes from both parents forms an individual's genotype. This genotype is a blueprint of potential traits. Examples of genotype...

