Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

08:09
Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
11.8K
Tube Revision Outcomes for Exposure with Different Repair Techniques
Abeer Alawi1, Ali AlBeshri1, Konrad Schargel1
1Glaucoma Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
|October 16, 2020
Summary
Glaucoma drainage device (GDD) exposure is a complication that can lead to re-exposure. Repair without a patch graft significantly increases the risk of subsequent GDD exposure.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Glaucoma Surgery
- Ophthalmic Devices
Background:
- Glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) are used to manage intraocular pressure.
- GDD exposure is a known complication requiring surgical repair.
- Understanding re-exposure rates is crucial for optimizing surgical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of eyes experiencing initial glaucoma drainage device (GDD) exposure.
- To analyze the risk and timing of subsequent re-exposures after GDD repair.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 42 patients (43 eyes) with GDD exposure (2008-2015).
- Data collected included GDD type, surgical repair techniques, and follow-up for re-exposure.
- Comparison of baseline features between eyes with and without further exposure.
Main Results:
- Ahmed FP7 was the most common GDD (31 eyes).
- Repair without a patch graft showed a two-fold increased risk of re-exposure (RR=2.10).
- 18 eyes experienced a second exposure, 4 a third, and 1 a fourth.
Conclusions:
- GDD exposure rates in this study align with existing literature.
- The absence of a patch graft during repair is a significant risk factor for GDD re-exposure.

