Assessing the Combinatorial Chemo-Photothermal Therapy Mediated by Sulfobetaine Methacrylate-Functionalized

Inês Mó1, Cátia G Alves1, Duarte de Melo-Diogo1

  • 1CICS-UBI - Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, 6200-506, Portugal.

Biotechnology Journal
|October 16, 2020
PubMed

Insights

3D spheroids, not 2D models, accurately screen nanomaterial-based cancer therapies. Chemo-photothermal therapy using Doxorubicin and IR780 nanoparticles showed significant promise in 3D spheroid models.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Nanomedicine
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Conventional 2D cancer models offer limited accuracy for nanomedicine screening.
  • 3D spheroids better mimic in vivo solid tumor characteristics, crucial for preclinical nanomedicine testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate chemo-photothermal therapy efficacy using Doxorubicin and IR780 loaded nanoparticles.
  • To compare therapeutic outcomes in 2D cancer cell monolayers versus 3D spheroids.

Main Methods:

  • Synthesized and characterized Doxorubicin and IR780 loaded sulfobetaine methacrylate functionalized nanoparticles.
  • Tested nanoparticle efficacy in both 2D cancer cell cultures and 3D spheroids.
  • Assessed viability after photothermal therapy, chemotherapy, and combined chemo-photothermal therapy.

Main Results:

  • In 2D models, chemo-photothermal therapy achieved 1% viability; photothermal therapy reduced viability by 58%; chemotherapy by 29%.
  • In 3D spheroids, photothermal therapy showed no cytotoxic effect; chemotherapy reduced viability to 42%.
  • Combined chemo-photothermal therapy in 3D spheroids reduced viability to 16%, demonstrating superior efficacy.

Conclusions:

  • 3D spheroids are essential for accurate in vitro screening of nanomedicine-based cancer therapies.
  • Combined chemo-photothermal therapy using these nanoparticles is a highly promising strategy for solid tumors.

Related Concept Videos