Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Treatment with Vancomycin Loaded Calcium Sulphate and Autogenous Bone in an Improved Rabbit Model of Bone Infection
Published on: March 14, 2019
Extended Antibiotic Coverage in the Management of Type II Open Fractures
Thompson McMurtrie1, John Prather1, Ryan Cone1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Abstract:
Responsible antibiotic stewardship requires surgeons treating open fractures to use the narrowest appropriate antibiotic coverage possible to prevent infection. Because inter-observer agreement about the application of the Gustilo-Anderson open fracture classification is moderate at best, antibiotic selection can be overly aggressive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of Type II open fractures treated with gram-positive coverage only (GP) versus broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage (BS) with piperacillin-tazobactam (PT). A retrospective review of all Type II open fractures was performed at a single Level one trauma center over a 5-year period (2013-2017). All patients received prophylactic antibiotics on arrival on the basis of the best judgment of classification by the house officer on call. The final Gustilo-Anderson open fracture classification was assigned intra-operatively by the operating surgeon. Two groups were created, a GP antibiotic group (cefazolin and/or clindamycin) and a BS group (PT). A minimum of 3-month follow-up was required for inclusion. Patient demographics, cost of treatment, fracture-related infection (FRI) rates, and infecting bacteria were assessed. The GP group contained 70 open fractures and the BS group contained 74 open fractures. Between the groups, there were no differences in age, sex, race, Body Mass Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Class, or smoking status. There were no statistical differences in Injury Severity Score (ISS), fracture location, fixation method, or rates of staged management with external fixation. There was no difference in FRI rate between the GP and BS groups (8.6% versus 10.8%; p = 0.78). The bacteria responsible for FRI were similar in the GP and BS groups. The hospital charge for PT was 4.39 × the cost of cefazolin. The use of BS coverage in Type II open fractures does not result in a lower infection rate and adds significant cost to patient care. These data support the use of a GP-only antibiotic regimen for Type II open fractures.
Insights
For Type II open fractures, using only gram-positive (GP) antibiotic coverage is as effective as broad-spectrum (BS) antibiotics in preventing infection and is more cost-effective. This supports using narrower antibiotic regimens.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Infectious Disease
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Antibiotic stewardship in open fractures aims for narrowest effective coverage.
- Inconsistent Gustilo-Anderson classification can lead to overly broad antibiotic use.
- Evaluating antibiotic strategies for Type II open fractures is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare infection rates and costs of gram-positive (GP) only versus broad-spectrum (BS) antibiotic coverage for Type II open fractures.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of Type II open fractures (2013-2017) at a Level 1 trauma center.
- Patients received prophylactic antibiotics based on initial classification.
- Groups: GP (cefazolin/clindamycin) vs. BS (piperacillin-tazobactam).
- Outcomes assessed: fracture-related infection (FRI) rates, costs, and infecting bacteria.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in FRI rates between GP (8.6%) and BS (10.8%) groups.
- Infecting bacteria were similar across both groups.
- Broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage (piperacillin-tazobactam) was significantly more expensive than GP coverage.
Conclusions:
- Broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage for Type II open fractures does not reduce infection rates.
- Gram-positive-only antibiotic regimens are recommended for Type II open fractures due to cost-effectiveness.
- Optimizing antibiotic selection improves patient care and reduces healthcare costs.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Tonsillitis II: Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
