Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
Published on: August 22, 2025
Convergence Vestibulo-ocular Reflex in Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction: Behavioral Evidence in Support of a Novel
Tzu-Pu Chang1, Michael C Schubert
1Department of Neurology/Neuro-medical, Scientific Center, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taichung, Taiwan (T.-P.C.); Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan (T.-P.C.); Laboratory of Vestibular NeuroAdaptation, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (M.C.S.); and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (M.C.S.).
Background And Purpose:
Convergence of the eyes during head rotation increases the gain (eye velocity/head velocity) of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). We sought to know whether convergence would increase the VOR gain (mean + SD) in unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH).
Methods:
Vestibulo-ocular reflex gain during ipsi- and contralesional horizontal head rotation at near (15 cm) and far (150 cm) targets was measured in 22 subjects with UVH and 12 healthy controls. Retinal slip was estimated (retinal slip index [RSI]) as the difference between ideal VOR gain (no retinal slip) and the actual VOR gain.
Results:
Convergence did not significantly enhance VOR gain for ipsilesional rotation (mean difference, 0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.01 to 0.09), near viewing (0.77 ± 0.34) versus far viewing (0.72 ± 0.29), yet the VOR gain during contralesional rotation was greater for near viewing (1.20 ± 0.23) than for far viewing (0.97 ± 0.21; mean difference, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.13-0.32). In the 36% of subjects with recovery of their ipsilesional VOR gain, the vergence effect trended to recover (far VOR gain: 1.06 ± 0.17 vs near VOR gain 1.16 ± 0.21; mean difference, 0.10; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.22). Ipsilesional head rotation induced greater retinal slip for near (RSI = 0.90 ± 0.34) targets than for far targets (RSI = 0.35 ± 0.29; mean difference, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.51-0.61).
Discussion And Conclusions:
The convergence-mediated VOR gain enhancement is preserved during contralesional but impaired during ipsilesional head rotation. Recovery of ipsilesional passive VOR gain does not equate to restored convergence enhancement, although it did increase ∼10%. These data suggest head motion viewing near targets will increase retinal slip, which warrants consideration as a gaze stability exercise for subjects with UVH.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A325).
Related Concept Videos
The Vestibular System
Equilibrium and Balance
Accessory Structures of the Eye

