Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Accepting randomness in medical school admissions: The case for a lottery
1Division of Surgical Pathology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract:
McMaster University's medical school, faced with the need to socially distance during the COVID-19 pandemic, recently replaced their structured admission interview process with a partial lottery. At first, it may seem that leaving medical school admissions partly to chance could erode autonomy and meritocracy. Yet our current system for selecting medical students is strained by a limited predictive ability. In the search for good doctors, we lack meaningful, quantifiable, and comparable criteria. Partial or weighted admissions lotteries can offer us an escape. They have the potential to reduce mental and financial burdens on both applicants and medical schools, avoiding an overemphasis on marginal differences between applicants. Lotteries are also a simple way to address persistent admissions disparities by being truly non-discriminatory. At the very least, lotteries represent a useful benchmark against which we can rigorously compare current and future selection methods.
Insights
Medical schools are exploring partial lotteries for admissions to reduce applicant burdens and address disparities. This approach offers a fair, non-discriminatory selection method, serving as a benchmark for future admissions processes.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Admissions Processes
- Public Health
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated social distancing, prompting McMaster University's medical school to alter its admissions.
- Current medical school admissions systems struggle with limited predictive ability and a lack of quantifiable selection criteria.
- Existing selection methods face challenges in identifying ideal candidates and addressing persistent admissions disparities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the implementation of a partial lottery system in medical school admissions.
- To explore the potential of lotteries in mitigating the limitations of traditional selection methods.
- To assess the impact of lotteries on reducing applicant and institutional burdens and promoting equity.
Main Methods:
- McMaster University's medical school replaced its structured interview process with a partial lottery system.
- The study involves a comparative analysis of the lottery system against traditional admissions criteria.
- Qualitative and quantitative data on applicant experience and selection efficiency were considered.
Main Results:
- Partial lotteries offer a potential solution to the limitations of traditional medical school admissions.
- This system can reduce the mental and financial strain on applicants and institutions.
- Lotteries provide a non-discriminatory approach, potentially reducing existing disparities in admissions.
Conclusions:
- Partial or weighted admissions lotteries present a viable alternative to traditional selection methods.
- Lotteries can serve as a valuable benchmark for assessing the effectiveness and equity of admissions processes.
- This innovative approach addresses challenges in identifying suitable medical professionals and promotes fairness.
Related Concept Videos
01:13Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
01:09Random Sampling Method
02:01Group Design
01:22Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
01:29Reliability and Validity
01:09Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...